[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2269:
Attachment: LUCENE-2269.patch
patch
> don't download/extract 20,000 files when doing the build
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2269?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2269:
Attachment: reuters.578.lines.zip
data file that goes in contrib/benchmark/src/test/o/a/l/benchmar
don't download/extract 20,000 files when doing the build
Key: LUCENE-2269
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2269
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Test
Compo
ahh you are right Uwe, even if you aren't using custom attributes, positions
could be wrong in the index, for example.
I have to go through this, but reindexing is not required, because the bugs
> were mostly missing clearAttributes() calls leading to StopFilter integer
> overflows (with Version.L
+1 on releasing.
On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hallo Folks,
>
> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.2 and 3.0.1 (which
> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release announcement),
> build from revision 910082 of the corresponding bra
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:50 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hi Grant, inline:
>
>> Inline
>>
>> On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>> Hallo Folks,
>>>
>>> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.2 and
>> 3.0.1 (which both have the same bug fix level, functionalit
i think users will have to read CHANGES to determine this: i.e. they could
be using a buggy filter and be unaffected, if they aren't using custom
attributes, certain shingle parameters, highlighting with multivalued
fields, etc, etc.
> How about: "Several bugs in Contrib's Analyzers package were
Hi Grant, inline:
> Inline
>
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
> > Hallo Folks,
> >
> > I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.2 and
> 3.0.1 (which both have the same bug fix level, functionality and
> release announcement), build from revision 910082 of t
On Feb 17, 2010, at 5:35 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Inline
>
> On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>
>> Hallo Folks,
>>
>> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.2 and 3.0.1
>> (which both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release
>> announcem
Inline
On Feb 14, 2010, at 6:45 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> Hallo Folks,
>
> I have posted a release candidate for both Lucene Java 2.9.2 and 3.0.1 (which
> both have the same bug fix level, functionality and release announcement),
> build from revision 910082 of the corresponding branches. Tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834986#action_12834986
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2268:
-
+1, this would be good to know that the maven s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834943#action_12834943
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. Strange that the automaton author did not a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-2268:
--
Component/s: Build
Affects Version/s: 3.0.1
2.9.2
> Add test
Add test to check maven artifacts and their poms
Key: LUCENE-2268
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2268
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: Uwe Schin
Add solr's artifact signing scripts into lucene's build.xml/common-build.xml
Key: LUCENE-2267
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2267
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834824#action_12834824
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1720:
bq. I have commit rights
Oh, sorry, I didn't kno
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834819#action_12834819
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-1720:
--
bq. How do we proceed from here? Is there a c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1720?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834801#action_12834801
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1720:
How do we proceed from here? Is there a committer
+1 from me - I've put both releases through their paces - though
technically, there are a handful of files that look like they need
apache headers (css, html) that are reported by rat. I don't think this
is a new issue though, so I don't think its something we need to be that
picky about right now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834732#action_12834732
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. The question is now, is this extra prefix c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1761?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834730#action_12834730
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1761:
I don't think there will be much
Hi all,
I tested the lucene-core-3.0.1.jar in production since Sunday afternoon, no
problems. I also replaced by the 2.9.2 file in my dev environment (without
recompilations, because the locally added generics would break only the
compilation but not the JVM of my projects) and tested: works.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12834695#action_12834695
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2089:
---
Hi Robert,
I reviewed you latest patch and
23 matches
Mail list logo
