[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841106#action_12841106
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2293:
bq. The IndexWriter (or a new class) would have t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1879?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841078#action_12841078
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1879:
(Warning, this post is long, and is easier to rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840952#action_12840952
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. I hope we won't lose monotonic docIDs f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840949#action_12840949
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2293:
-
bq. The IndexWriter (or a new class) wo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840918#action_12840918
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
Mike, good one! Would having a doc i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840911#action_12840911
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
Good timing - a couple days ago I was think
IndexWriter has hard limit on max concurrency
-
Key: LUCENE-2293
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840836#action_12840836
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
Thanks Mike, I'll regen tonight and pass thru t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2089:
---
Attachment: createLevAutomata.py
Added usage line, fixed missing space in license he
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2089:
Attachment: LUCENE-2089.patch
first shot at a committable patch. please review.
> explore using a
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> Yeah in the case of DirectoryReader/MultiReader, I'd like for them to
>> be final, not for performance but for door-shutting (ie the same
>> reason we make analyzers final).
>
> D
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840718#action_12840718
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. So eg maybe they could check in a LICENSE f
Maybe now its also running correct with the filter?
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Dyutiman [mailto:dyutiman.chaudh...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 2:34 PM
> To: java-dev
This is actually what I mean by [intentional] door shutting -- we want
to disallow extending our analyzers because it can easily lead to
sneaky problems, and, because it's so simple to make your own analyzer
that builds up the same chain.
Mike
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:14 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
In the analyzers case, I don't think its really door-shutting. if someone
extends an Analyzer, its likely to just result in problems from the
tokenStream/reusableTokenStream mess.
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>
On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:51 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> Yeah in the case of DirectoryReader/MultiReader, I'd like for them to
> be final, not for performance but for door-shutting (ie the same
> reason we make analyzers final).
Door shutting often is not a good thing, especially in a project lik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840660#action_12840660
]
Ritesh Nigam commented on LUCENE-2280:
--
Sorry for the delayed response but i was tryi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840658#action_12840658
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2089:
Mercurial (hg) is just the source
Oho... actually I didn't check that part of my code at all
Thanks a lot for pointing out this to me. The search is running perfectly
now
thanks
Dyutiman
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Lucene-Filter-tp27756577p27768251.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer m
>>Document doc = searcher.doc(i);
Isn't "i" your results order number as opposed to a lucene document id?
I.e. the first result could be document id 3,232,432 but you are asking for doc
#1
You need to get to doc id out of topDocs
Cheers
Mark
- Original Message
From: Dyutiman
To:
Thanks Erick,
I tried Luke and it seems that my index is fine (see the screenshot attached
http://old.nabble.com/file/p27767115/luke.JPG luke.JPG ).
That means I did something wrong in my code. I am attaching my search code
here also ( http://old.nabble.com/file/p27767115/SearchUtil.java
SearchUt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840585#action_12840585
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
bq. I don't see the [MIT] license on that publi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12840557#action_12840557
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2089:
This is awesome progress Robert!!
23 matches
Mail list logo
