[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841697#action_12841697
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2293:
But if each DW maintains its own doc IDs, separat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841694#action_12841694
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
Ok, then I'll proceed w/ #3.
> Create IndexWrite
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841617#action_12841617
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. The big advantage is that all (re)opene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841595#action_12841595
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2294:
--
Yay, we'll be able to remove SolrIndexConfig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841574#action_12841574
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
I voted for killing these delegating me
All possible unordered matches with a given slop can be so many that
enumerating them all will be so slow that it is impractical for general use.
Note that I have not been very precise: one should also consider the
same term indexed in the same position multiple times (not normal,
but not impossib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841545#action_12841545
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
I thought that when (3) happens, th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841535#action_12841535
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
There are some settings on IW that go directly to
Paul (and Mark),
Thank you for answering. Do you suppose "not really straightforward" means "40
hours" or something like that? I'm just trying to get an idea of whether what
I'm attempting is worth the effort.
Mike
-Original Message-
From: java-dev-return-47351-michael.j.goddard=s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841463#action_12841463
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2293:
What about the following scenario:
# A document i
Marvin,
thank you for taking the time to write up this great guidelines. Would
you mind adding this to the wiki? I think
this is very valuable for new devs and contributors.
simon
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:28 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> (CC to lucy-dev and general, reply-to set to general)
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841407#action_12841407
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
bq. Yes, I think each DW will have to recor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841395#action_12841395
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2293:
bq. Cool! I wasn't sure if you wa
(CC to lucy-dev and general, reply-to set to general)
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 06:18:28AM +, Shai Erera (JIRA) wrote:
> (Warning, this post is long, and is easier to read in JIRA)
I consume email from many of the Lucene lists, and I hate it when people force
me to read stuff via JIRA. It slo
On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 05:55:44AM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> The problem is, these scoring models need the avg field length (in
>> tokens) across the entire index, to compute the norms.
>>
>> Ie, you can't do that on writing a sing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841388#action_12841388
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
But, I was proposing a bigger chang
Michael,
The test for the 4th range fails because the first matching subspans
(for t1 in this case) is always the one that is first advanced, and the first
match at that point has a less slop (0) than the maximum allowed (1)
so one might actually try and advance another subspans first.
But that is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2283?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2283.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Tim!
> Possible Memory Leak in StoredFieldsWriter
>
On 03/04/2010 11:34 AM, Goddard, Michael J. wrote:
// Question: why wouldn't this Span be found?
assertTrue("fourth range", spans.next());
assertEquals("fourth doc", 11, spans.doc());
assertEquals("fourth start", 2, spans.start());
assertEquals("fourth end", 6, spans.end());
Spa
I've been working on some highlighting changes involving Spans
(https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2287) and could use some help
understanding when overlapping Spans are valid. To illustrate, I added the
test below to the TestSpans class; this test fails because there is no fourth
ra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841347#action_12841347
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2293:
Yes, I think each DW will have to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841342#action_12841342
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2293:
--
bq. But WaitQueue would go away with
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841339#action_12841339
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2294:
bq. Today there is no DEFAULT ..
+1
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> For those committers that don't follow the general mailing list, or follow
> it that closely, we are currently having a vote for committers:
>
> http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/4722d3144c2e3a8b/vote_merge_lucene_solr_devel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841262#action_12841262
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
I wouldn't worry about what's required - Director
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841249#action_12841249
]
Mark Miller edited comment on LUCENE-2294 at 3/4/10 1:45 PM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841249#action_12841249
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2294:
-
I can see the value in this - there are a bunch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841239#action_12841239
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
bq. But, if we change the default to UNLIMITED
T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841235#action_12841235
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2293:
Perhaps instead of buffering the delete Terms/Que
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841232#action_12841232
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2294:
+1 -- this is great!
bq. I am no
For those committers that don't follow the general mailing list, or
follow it that closely, we are currently having a vote for committers:
http://search.lucidimagination.com/search/document/4722d3144c2e3a8b/vote_merge_lucene_solr_development
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841225#action_12841225
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2293:
I agree IW should not spawn its o
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841207#action_12841207
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
I'm thinking to make this whole IWC a constructor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841199#action_12841199
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
IndexingChain is one of the things that can be se
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841193#action_12841193
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-2293:
-
bq. I wonder if that won't complicate I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841189#action_12841189
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
I was wondering if perhaps instead of allowing to
If Solr/Lucene dev were merged, and queryParser is it's own module,
this user could simply upgrade his queryParser JAR to get this fix.
Mike
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alexander S (JIRA)
Date: Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 2:24 AM
Subject: (SOLR-355) Parsing mixed inclusive/exclusive r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841173#action_12841173
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
Yeah I don't like it either (makes my code unnece
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841172#action_12841172
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2294:
---
In my opinion the whole class is unneeded,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841166#action_12841166
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2294:
Thanks Uwe for the pointer.
I suppose that MaxFi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841152#action_12841152
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-2294 at 3/4/10 10:00 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841152#action_12841152
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2294:
---
+1 for the IndexWriterConfig with chaining
Create IndexWriterConfiguration and store all of IW configuration there
---
Key: LUCENE-2294
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2294
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841140#action_12841140
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2293:
Ok so I think I understand now. You propose to ch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841135#action_12841135
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
Sorry - after reading my comment again I ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841127#action_12841127
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2293:
bq. What I described is not much different from w
yaa... and now I am trying with multiple filters. Thanks
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Lucene-Filter-tp27756577p27778081.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12841120#action_12841120
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-2293:
---
{quote}
Also, in the pull approach, Lucene
48 matches
Mail list logo
