[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843385#action_12843385
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1709:
--
Robert, very nice!
> Parallelize T
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843354#action_12843354
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2089:
YEAH!
> explore using automaton
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843337#action_12843337
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2089:
---
Phantastic!
> explore using automaton for
Spurious exception in TestIndexWriter
-
Key: LUCENE-2307
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2307
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.0.2
Environment: MacO
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843331#action_12843331
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-2089:
-
Sweet!
> explore using automaton for fuzzyquer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2089:
Assignee: Robert Muir (was: Mark Miller)
I think this patch is ready.
Will commit in a few days
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1990:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1990.patch
OK new patch attached:
- Ported to flex, and cutove
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:18:12PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> >> You said "of course" before but... how in your proposal could one
> >> store all stats for a given field during indexing, but then sometimes
> >> use match-only and sometimes full-scoring when querying against that
> >> fie
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:11 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
>> > I don't know that compressing the raw materials is going to work as well as
>> > compressing the final product. Early quantization errors get compounded
>> > when
>> > used in later calculations.
>>
>> I would not compress for starters.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1889?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843261#action_12843261
]
Digy commented on LUCENE-1889:
--
bq. One thing i noticed immediately is that many query types
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 01:04:19PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
> BM25 needs the field length in tokens. lnu.ltc needs avg(tf). These
> 2 stats seem to the "common" ones (according to Robert). So I want to
> start with them.
OK, interesting.
> > I don't know that compressing the raw materi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2089?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2089:
Attachment: LUCENE-2089.patch
Updated patch:
* optimizations for small indexes
* improved tests
t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843220#action_12843220
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1990:
bq. Why has one class a full-uppe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843218#action_12843218
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1990:
bq. We should also add the @lucen
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843215#action_12843215
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1990:
bq. It will help a lot if you tak
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:06:08AM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> > For what it's worth, that's sort of the way KS used to work:
>> > Schema/FieldType
>> > information was stored entirely in source code. That's changed and now we
>>
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 02:23:47PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> For a large index the stats will be stable after re-indexing only a
>> few more docs.
>
> Well, not if there's been huge churn on other nodes in the interim.
Right.
>>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jingkei Ly updated LUCENE-2306:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2306.patch
Updated patch to include a QueryBuilder for NumericRangeQuery.
I als
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843178#action_12843178
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-2306:
---
Would it be also possible to alternatively
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2306?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jingkei Ly updated LUCENE-2306:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-2306.patch
Attached patch
> contrib/xml-query-parser: NumericRangeFilter support
contrib/xml-query-parser: NumericRangeFilter support
Key: LUCENE-2306
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2306
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Compon
On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 05:06:08AM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
> > For what it's worth, that's sort of the way KS used to work:
> > Schema/FieldType
> > information was stored entirely in source code. That's changed and now we
> > serialize the whole schema including all Analyzers, but sourc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843027#action_12843027
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990:
Michael McCandless:
{quote}
* I think
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1990?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12843028#action_12843028
]
Toke Eskildsen commented on LUCENE-1990:
Uwe Schindler:
{quote}
We should also add
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 9:47 PM, Marvin Humphrey wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 08, 2010 at 01:13:53PM -0500, Michael McCandless wrote:
>> I think we can actually do so w/o losing Lucene's loose typing if we
>> simply peeled out [say] a FieldType class that holds the settings you
>> now set on each field (om
25 matches
Mail list logo
