[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553213
]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-666:
For Dejan Nenov - please use this new email address:
d [at] panaton [dot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12505648
]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-666:
For Dejan Nenov - please use this new email address:
d [at] panaton [dot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12499388
]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-525:
For Dejan Nenov - please use this new email address:
d [at] panaton [dot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467325
]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-666:
For Dejan Nenov - please use this new email address:
d [at] panaton [dot
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-666?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-666:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.0.0
Any chance this may be addressed in 2.0?
> TERM1 OR NOT TERM2 does not perf
I concur with Hoss - a default to immediate exception throwing and optional
implementation for Windows would server everyone best I think.
Dejan
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2006 2:57 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-666?page=comments#action_12431761 ]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-666:
I propose that we throw a ParseException - it seems very straightforward to do
- any comments / concerns / objections
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-72?page=comments#action_12431760 ]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-72:
---
This makes sense. Iconcur that docs can be better - maybe we shoud lopen a
separate JIRA issue on that?
I propose this to
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-72?page=comments#action_12431760 ]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-72:
---
This makes sense. Iconcur that docs can be better - maybe we shoud lopen a
separate JIRA issue on that?
I propose this to
Affects Versions: 2.0.0
Environment: Windows XP, JavaCC 4.0, JDK 1.5
Reporter: Dejan Nenov
Attachments: TestAornotB.java
test:
[junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.search.TestAornotB
[junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 0.39 sec
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-72?page=all ]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-72:
--
Attachment: TestRegressionLucene72.java
Please ignore the previos version - it was very sloppy.
I added one more test, which yields a strange (for me) result
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-72?page=all ]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-72:
--
Attachment: TestRegressionLucene72.java
Please ignore the previos version - it was very sloppy.
I added one more test, which yields a strange (for me) result
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-72?page=all ]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-72:
--
Attachment: TestRegressionLucene72.java
This issue was so old that I wanted to verify thatit still exists.
The attached test is specific to the issue and indeed
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-72?page=all ]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-72:
--
Attachment: TestRegressionLucene72.java
This issue was so old that I wanted to verify thatit still exists.
The attached test is specific to the issue and indeed
I have been browsing the JIRA repository looking to possible help cleanup
old stuff.
Would one of the committers please take a look at
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-25?
There seems to be a patch submitted on Feb 10, 2004, but the issue has
neither been closed nor marked "won't Fix".
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-38?page=all ]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-38:
--
Attachment: TestRangeQuery.patch
Added additional tests, using "null" as the lower term in the range query. The
tests are commented to indicate how they
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-38?page=all ]
Dejan Nenov updated LUCENE-38:
--
Attachment: TestRangeQuery.patch
Added additional tests, using "null" as the lower term in the range query. The
tests are commented to indicate how they
l along with all of its
dependencies and it has plugins that create project files for
IntelliJ and Eclipse (not sure about NetBeans). With a little
tweaking, it setups our version control, source locations, compiler/
debugger settings, etc.
-Grant
On Aug 22, 2006, at 6:07 PM, Dejan Nenov wrot
Would there be an interest in developing / contributing "canned" installers
for the more popular IDEs.
I would love to have a continuously built set of install JARs that let me
install the Lucene sources, test apps, contributions and necessary libraries
in one shot on my choice of Eclipse, NetB
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12423731 ]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-550:
And whil ewe wait - may we please have highres PNGs - so that the zoomed-in
versions are a little more readable
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12423719 ]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-550:
Can we please get the class diagrams in PDF format - the PNGs are so tny - they
are undreadable :(
> InstanciatedIn
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-525?page=comments#action_12376995 ]
Dejan Nenov commented on LUCENE-525:
Is it appropriate / allowed to suggest lucene-based commercial search servers,
that do what the reporter is after?
> A stand
22 matches
Mail list logo
