Thanks for the clarification Chris. My key concern was that "tags" was
becoming too crowded as-is, and important data is getting lost in the crowd.
Looks like Uwe has a solution per
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2193. If this won't do, I like
you suggestion of structuring "tags" p
I have http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/trunk/ and
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/java/tags/ checked out.
I think having all this "back_compat" folders, under the "tags" can be very
confusing, especially for someone who looks in "tags" in search of a
released version and finds a
Yes, the goal is to be 1-to-1 in sync which is how it always has been and
why version number consistency is important.
A Lucene.Net assembly, has version number with 4 digits, like so:
"Lucene.Net 2.9.1.016" -- the last number "016" is used to both signify an
internal release, as the port is progr
> it at some point soonish? It's accumulated some important bug fixes.
> >
> > Mike
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 4, 2010 at 10:59 PM, George Aroush
> wrote:
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > > Over at Lucene.Net, we have 2.9.1 ready for official re
Hi folks,
Why do I see \java\tags\lucene_*_back_compat_tests_2009*\ directories (well
over 100 so far) when I SVN update?
Thanks.
-- George
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional comman
Hi Folks,
Over at Lucene.Net, we have 2.9.1 ready for official release. This is a
port of the current Lucene Java 2.9.1 release.
When I raised the question about releasing Lucene.Net 2.9.1, a question was
asked to port over LUCENE-2190 for which a patch was quickly made (see:
https://issues.apac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779424#action_12779424
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENE-2076:
---
Sure, 3.1 will do. Thanks guys!
&
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779261#action_12779261
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENE-2076:
---
Under Lucene.Net 2.9.1, we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12779101#action_12779101
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENE-2076:
---
Mark's response is right on.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2076?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush updated LUCENE-2076:
--
Attachment: FSDirectory.patch
Patch attached.
>
Components: Store
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: George Aroush
Priority: Minor
Fix For: 3.0
On the Apache Lucene.Net side, we have done some clean up with the upcoming
2.9.1 such that we are now depreciating improperly use of parameter type for
some public APIs
Sorry, I'm just catching up with my mailing list inbox, ...
Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> >
> > I used the Luke tool from getopt.org and it worked flawlessly, optimizing
> > the index in just over 2 hours. Problem is that my search cannot use it, and
> > the error states Unknown Format Version error
> -Original Message-
> From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:hossman_luc...@fucit.org]
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 1:00 AM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net (was: RE: Lucene 2.9
RC2 now available for testing)
>
>
> : My question is, I would p
iller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 29, 2009 11:56 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Porting Java Lucene 2.9 to Lucene.Net
George Aroush wrote:
>>> while I'm subscribed to SVN's commits mailing list, I'm not getting
>>> all those commits!
> > while I'm subscribed to SVN's commits mailing list, I'm not getting
> > all those commits! For example, a commit made this past Friday, I
> > never got an email for, while other commits I do. Any idea what
> > maybe going on?
>
> There has been some flakiness with ASF servers, so maybe
Hi Folks,
I have been following the expected release of Lucene.Net 2.9 for some weeks
now, and about 2 weeks ago, just before RC1 was released, I grabbed the code
off the trunk and started my initial port. Today, I compared what I have with
what's in RC2, only 6 Java files changes -- this is g
other
questions George, feel free to ask.
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:04 AM, George Aroush wrote:
Thanks Mike.
A quick follow up question. What's the status of
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313? Can this work be applied
to Lucene 2.4.1 and still get it's benefit or are t
ther small things and probably some big ones that I'm
> forgetting now :)
>
> So things are still in flux, and I'm really not sure on a
> release date at this point. Late last year, I was hoping for
> early this year, but it's no longer early this year ;)
>
&g
Hi Folks,
This is George Aroush, I'm one of the committers on Lucene.Net - a port of
Java Lucene to C# Lucene.
I'm looking at the current trunk code of yet to be released Lucene 2.9 and I
would like to port it to Lucene.Net. If I do this now, we get the benefit
of keeping our cod
Hi Folks,
Over at the Lucene.Net mailing list, the following JIRA issue came up:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-51
This was discovered as we were porting Java Lucene 2.1 to Lucene.Net 2.1.
Can you folks offer some insight into this issue?
Regards,
-- George Aroush
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
George Aroush updated LUCENE-707:
-
Attachment: lucene.apache.org.patch
Hi Dough,
Attached is a patch to add Lucene.Net to TLP of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461904
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENE-707:
--
Thanks for the quick response Grant!
Unfortunately, I am not familiar
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12461894
]
George Aroush commented on LUCENE-707:
--
Hi,
What will it take to fix the page at http://lucene.apache.org/ so
tanding I can judge how serious this issue is and find a fix for it or
just document it as a language difference between Java and .NET.
Btw, this is based on Lucene 2.0 for both Java and C# Lucene.
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-
To
be released will help me plan things out.
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-Original Message-
From: George Aroush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 12:07 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Lucene 2.0.1 release date
Hi folks,
What's the plan for Lucene
Hi folks,
What's the plan for Lucene 2.0.1 release date?
Thanks!
-- George Aroush
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If I read the JIRA issue right, it look as if this is fixed in Lucene 2.0.1.
Is it?
If so, where can I download 2.0.1?
Thanks!
-- George Aroush
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 3:21 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
antly, is
it safe?
Thanks.
-- George Aroush
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks Hoss. I submitted a JIRA issue:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-852
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 19, 2006 2:11 AM
To: Lucene Dev
Cc: general@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Lucene.NET Jira Emails?
: If this i
Thanks Hoss.
If this is the case, who ever has the karma to fix this, can you take care
of it?
Also, I can't figure out how to assign, close or even edit a JIRA issue
opened against Lucene.Net. For example, take a look at:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-6 and I can't see anything
Hi Chris,
I don't think this is intentional. Something is broken in the JIRA setup.
I have posted this email on general@incubator.apache.org to see if folks
there may know what's the problem and fix it.
Thanks for noticing
-- George
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMA
Hi Pasha,
That is defiantly not happening in my case. Here is an output:
Setup()
TestBarelyCloseEnough()
TestExact()
TestMulipleTerms()
TestNotCloseEnough()
TestOrderDoesntMatter()
TestPhraseQueryInConjunctionScorer()
TestPhraseQueryWithStopAnalyzer()
TestSlop1()
TestSlopScoring()
TestWrappedPhr
n
On 6/16/06, George Aroush <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I realize this question is not directly related to Lucene, but I
> believe it's worth asking.
>
> With Lucene.Net (for those who don't know, is a port of Jakarta Lucene
> from Java to C#) I
Hi folks,
I realize this question is not directly related to Lucene, but I believe
it's worth asking.
With Lucene.Net (for those who don't know, is a port of Jakarta Lucene from
Java to C#) I use NUnit to test the same test code (ported to C#) that JUnit
test. When I run the NUnit test there are
Hi,
I am not too excited about using SharpZipLib -- if I use it, unlike now,
DotLucene will end up with a 3rd party dependency thus, the port can't be
used out of the box. I know, I might not have a better alternative.
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-Original Message-
From: Pasha B
Hi Folks,
As far as I know, we have not yet coordinated who and when will be working
with the ladies to give them a hand on Saturday. This was one of my agenda
for our meeting for Thursday, but since the meeting has been postponed, it
is now an outstanding urgent issue.
Hikmat: Maybe you already
used
in Lucene 1.9 RC1 for Index.FieldsWriter and Index.FieldsReader. Any
suggestion?
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-Original Message-
From: Monsur Hossain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:18 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: RE: Questions about Delet
Hi Folks,
I am looking at Lucene 1.9 RC1 and noticed that MMapDirectory is using
java.nio. Isn't java.nio based on Java 1.4? If so, isn't Lucene 1.9
suppose to be backward compatible with Java 1.3?
Regards,
-- Geo
38 matches
Mail list logo
