RE: Lucene and Javolution: A good mix ?

ike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Thursday, April 5, 2007 1:58:38 PM Subject: Re: Lucene and Javolution: A good mix ? On 4/4/07, Jean-Philippe Robichaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand your concerns! > > I was a little skeptical at

RE: Lucene and Javolution: A good mix ?

I also think that when you start doing you own memory management you might as well write the code in C/C++ because you need to use similar techniques (similar to the resource management when using SWT). Just my thoughts. On Apr 4, 2007, at 8:54 PM, Jean-Philippe Robichaud wrote: > Hello Dear Lu

Lucene and Javolution: A good mix ?

Hello Dear Lucene coders! Some of you may remember, I'm using lucene for a product (and many other internal utilities). I'm also using another open source library called Javolution (www.javolution.org ) which does many things, one of them being to offer excellent r

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-844) org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.FindSegmentsFile.run() throwing NullPointerException

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12483305 ] Jean-Philippe Robichaud commented on LUCENE-844: Oh, that's great. Will it be released soon ag

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-844) org.apache.lucene.index.SegmentInfos.FindSegmentsFile.run() throwing NullPointerException

Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Bug Components: Store Affects Versions: 2.1 Reporter: Jean-Philippe Robichaud When writing a WeakReference based cache for storing IndexReader objects, I was hit by a NullPointerException thrown from nowhere The actual

RE: Is Lucene Java trunk still stable for production code?

I would move to 2.1, but that's just me! -Grant On Mar 14, 2007, at 5:12 PM, Jean-Philippe Robichaud wrote: > Hello Dear Lucene Users! > > > > Back in the old days (well, last year) the lucene/java/trunk > subversion > path was always stable enough for everyone to use