On 4/26/05, Daniel Naber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2005 21:09, Erik Hatcher wrote:
>
> > I don't know would it? I have no preference, though it seems ok to
> > me to simply return null since this is the toString method. For a
> > Document, the toString is only useful for
On 4/26/05, Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, is "a future for a hit" a typo, or does that actually mean
> something? This makes me think of Python's "future", but I'm not sure
> what this means in this context.
My feeling originally was that as the obtaining of the document
wa