[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-745?page=comments#action_12457838 ]
Kevin Oliver commented on LUCENE-745:
-
This should also be considered along with LUCENE-711, which sizes some of the
other Vectors more appropriately.
> M
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-532?page=all ]
Kevin Oliver updated LUCENE-532:
Attachment: cfs-patch.txt
Here are some diffs on how to remove seeks from CompoundFileWriter (this is
against an older version of Lucene, 1.4.2 I think, but
We considered patching this code when we ran into a data consistency
issue bug with our file system. It wasn't too difficult to patch
CompoundFileWriter to output lengths instead of offsets.
Naturally, I can't seem to find my implementation of this, but as I
recall it wasn't too difficult to do. I
IndexSearcher searcher = new
IndexSearcher("/dev/searchdata/addIndexesTest1");
Hits hits = searcher.search(new TermQuery(new Term("f",
"words")));
assertEquals(2, hits.length());
searcher.close();
}
}
-Original Me
Volodymyr, I tried this patch out, and unfortunately it doesn't appear
to work for me. Is there something I missed?
I'll try attaching my Junit test case that works when the code is
unpatched, but fails on the final assertion expecting 2 hits (on line
63) when I used the patched IndexWriter.java.
org
Subject: Re: Avoiding segment merges during indexing
Kevin - are you saying that you can just comment out the 2 optimize()
calls and addIndexes(Directory[]) will keep working? I don't recall
why there are optimize() calls again, but I know several people had
issues with it...
Otis
--- Kevin
there are optimize() calls again, but I know several people had
issues with it...
Otis
--- Kevin Oliver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is a proposal that is in need of some insights.
>
> In an effort to speed up adding documents to an existing index, we
> are
> pursu
erstanding. Is there a clean way of
doing what I'm proposing? Is there some hidden catch I'm missing and
I've been going down the wrong path?
It seems to me this would be a great benefit to anyone who does indexing
on existing indexes and wants it to be fas
