I wonder, if there are really people using SVN and downloading douzens
> of
> patch files from jira? Isn't it, that everybody already uses git-svn?
>
>
No.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2399.
-
Resolution: Fixed
> Add support for ICU's Nor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858152#action_12858152
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2399:
-
Committed revision 935186.
Will l
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-1343:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> A replacement for ISOLatin1AccentFilter that does a more thoro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch
I made the filter non-final, and only incrementToken final instead
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1343?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858144#action_12858144
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1343:
-
OK! I think we have a good solution here!.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1215.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
I am marking this resolved as a duplicate of LUCENE-2399.
The new ICU
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch
I added some additional javadocs to try to explain the default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12858130#action_12858130
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2399:
-
bq. I know, you were running the test wit
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch
i made this filter final, to avoid a ticket from the policeman
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Attachment: LUCENE-2399.patch
This patch is so simple, instead of 3 hairy tokenfilters.
I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2399?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2399:
Assignee: Robert Muir
> Add support for ICU's Nor
sions: 3.1
Reporter: Robert Muir
Fix For: 3.1
While there are separate Case Folding, Normalization, and Ignorable-removal
filters in LUCENE-1488,
the new ICU Normalizer2 API does this all at once with nfkc_cf (based on the
new NFKC_Casefold property in Unicode).
This is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857942#action_12857942
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2398:
-
Committed an additional fix: 935048,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2398.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 935014.
> Improve tests to work easier from I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398:
Fix Version/s: 3.1
Affects Version/s: 3.1
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2398:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> Improve tests to work easier from I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857911#action_12857911
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2398:
-
All tests pass with the latest p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398:
Attachment: LUCENE-2398.patch
the attached patch refactors the benchmark tests:
* logic to run a
wants to put things in a stable branch I really do
think thats a sign of something (mostly that its not as important as you
seem to think)
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
ell,
then thats a sign that no one cares about it.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398:
Attachment: LUCENE-2398.patch
Attached is an updated patch, with a new test for MemoryIndex
ot see it in the build.xml :-/
>
>
Believe it or not, there are some oddities about these benchmark tests when
running from ant, too! Several people reported problems with them on
LUCENE-1709, once we parallelized tests. They are not even currently fixed,
only hacked to run sequentially...!
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
, Paolo Castagna <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Robert Muir wrote:
>
>> The Collation failure is because its "CollationTestBase" should really be
>> abstract... I'll fix this one and see if theres any others here we can make
>&g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857791#action_12857791
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2398:
-
I checked into this "lucene.common.
Improve tests to work easier from IDEs
--
Key: LUCENE-2398
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Test
Reporter: Robert Muir
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2398:
Attachment: LUCENE-2398.patch
attached is a patch that makes CollationTestBase, BaseTestLRU, and
The Collation failure is because its "CollationTestBase" should really be
abstract... I'll fix this one and see if theres any others here we can make
easier.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 7:41 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> Hi Paolo:
>
> I actually run all the tests from ant... but
still have some errors (see errors.txt attached).
>
> If you use Eclipse, do you have an idea on what I am doing wrong?
>
> Thanks,
> Paolo
>
> Paolo Castagna wrote:
>
>> Robert Muir wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:15 AM, Paolo Castagna <
here is lucene-analyzer-icu-4.0.jar that works
with icu 4.4. and you could keep using that as long as you have to
(meanwhile trunk could start using icu 4.6)
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857556#action_12857556
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. Hmmm. If we are moving stuff out of
As soon as I have removed version, then we can fix StandardTokenizer too!
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 5:13 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
> By all means Robert ... by all means :). Remember who started that thread,
> and for what reason :D.
>
> Shai
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 12:01 A
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2396:
Summary: remove version from core and contrib analyzers. (was: remove
version from contrib
t;
> But I think we've chewed that way too much. I am all for removing bw on
> Analyzers, and 2396 is a great step towards it (or maybe it is IT?). Even
> index format - I don't see when it will change next (but I think I have an
> idea ...), so we can tackle it then.
>
> Sha
the current policy, its like we are in 1.x forever our
version numbers are a joke!
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
re currently facing
> in core.
>
> Andi..
>
>
that was actually a typo, sorry :) But maybe not a bad idea for the future.
for now simply moving analyzers to its own jar filE would be a great step!
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
s major releases).
its also much safer when you are using the same bytecodes you used before,
instead of hairy back compat layers. I don't refer to Uwe's code here: its
perfect, but we cant force Uwe into writing the back compat for every big
feature.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857507#action_12857507
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. I can go along with this.
Cool!
b
bile: +7 (495) 683-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> > ICQ: 104465785
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >
> >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857490#action_12857490
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
{quote}
One mechanism that would wor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857471#action_12857471
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. How can I use lucene-analyzers-3.0.ja
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857466#action_12857466
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. I could live with thatmaybe.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857440#action_12857440
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. There has been an implicit bw co
ings without making 20 copies of something
or scattering Version everywhere.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857412#action_12857412
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. Until we have no more analyzers in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857398#action_12857398
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
{quote}
Static? Weren't you against t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857395#action_12857395
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
{quote}
Robert I think this is great! Ca
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857386#action_12857386
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
bq. Are you sure you want to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2396:
Attachment: LUCENE-2396.patch
attached is a patch, including CHANGES rewording.
All Lucene/Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2396:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> remove version from contrib/analyz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857325#action_12857325
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
Also, i would like to remove all deprec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12857321#action_12857321
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2396:
-
Additionally, i would like to remove
Affects Versions: 3.1
Reporter: Robert Muir
Contrib/analyzers has no backwards-compatibility policy, so let's remove
Version so the API is consumable.
if you think we shouldn't do this, then instead explicitly state and vote on
what the backwards compatibility policy for contrib
-567-4 / +7 (903) 5-888-423
> ICQ: 104465785
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
e impossible for some cases?), you only have
> to, well, convert.
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 16:32, Danil Ε’ORIN wrote:
> > All I ask is a way to migrate existing indexes to newer format.
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 15:21, Robert Muir wrote:
> >>
&g
terface.
>
> It took years to build those indexes, rebuilding is not an option, and
> staying with old lucene forever just sucks.
>
> Danil.
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 14:57, Robert Muir wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>
rsion 3 in a
completely backwards compatible way, then under this new scheme it can
happen.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
e expectation that once they are used
>(in trunk) they will iterate/change/improve vs trying so hard to
>get things right on the first go for fear of future back compat
>horrors.
>
> Thoughts...?
>
> Mike
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
e, you put a ton of work into this, but not
all the backwards compatibility can be done like this, and what if somehow
this one had slipped through without this caching? I think most users would
consider it strange to experience a performance degradation in a minor
release from major changes...
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
results.
>
I think even things considered bugs were not actually "fixed" by default
because of this, until Version?
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
ded.
> So even a long-standing hater of everything static like me is tempted.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 16:30, Grant Ingersoll
> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 14, 2010, at 12:49 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 12:06 A
dex is stored. And now we are looking at
providing flexibility in scoring that will hopefully redefine lucene from
being a vector-space search engine library to something much more flexible?
This is a minor release?!
I definitely think we should rethink things.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
y any way, you have to reindex with them to get
the benefits.
I'd love to hear elaborations of any thoughts you have on how this could
work.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
but nothing came out of it.
>
Lets not dance around the real issue then.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
y will work with this proposal, since
the no-arg ctor would then emulate some random behavior depending on a
static.
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1709.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I've propagated Shai's improvements to Solr.
Additionally, I add
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855934#action_12855934
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2392:
-
{quote}
Really, maybe somehow we shoul
all docs
> > that have this term)
> > Still need at least the total term count for each field.
>
> --
> This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
> -
> If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
> -
> For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2392?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855802#action_12855802
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2392:
-
Mike, I don't think overlapTermCou
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12855700#action_12855700
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1709:
-
I committed the junit tempdir fix in revi
rsionField =
> > StandardAnalyzer.class.getSuperclass().getDeclaredField("matchVersion")
> > ;
> > matchVersionField.setAccessible(true);
> >
> > type = schema.getFieldType("textStandardAnalyzerDefault");
> >
>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>
--
Robert Muir
[email protected]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2358.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 932856.
> rename KeywordMarkerTokenFil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2358?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir reassigned LUCENE-2358:
---
Assignee: Robert Muir
> rename KeywordMarkerTokenFil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2390.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 932795.
> contrib/remote tests fail rando
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2390:
Fix Version/s: 3.1
(was: 4.0.0)
> contrib/remote tests fail rando
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2390:
Attachment: LUCENE-2390.patch
Patch that creates a RemoteTestCaseJ4 that binds to an ephemeral
Reporter: Robert Muir
Assignee: Robert Muir
Fix For: 4.0.0
The contrib/remote tests will fail randomly.
This is because they use this _TestUtil.getRandomSocketPort() which
simply generates a random number, but if this is already in use, it will fail
/fast-vector-highlighter into contrib/highlighter. (Robert
Muir)
+ Moved contrib/fast-vector-highlighter into contrib/highlighter.
+ Moved ChainedFilter from contrib/misc to contrib/queries.
contrib/spatial now
+ depends on contrib/queries instead of contrib/misc. (Robert Muir)
* LUCENE-2333
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2323:
Attachment: LUCENE-2323_surround.patch
attached is a patch to move surround to contrib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2323?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2323:
Attachment: LUCENE-2323_wikipedia.patch
now that flex is merged, its a good time to continue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2388.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 3.1
both patches are committed... if you find any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2388:
Attachment: LUCENE-2388_solr.patch
attached is a patch to fix the references on the solr site
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2388?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2388:
Attachment: LUCENE-2388.patch
attached is a patch for lucene.
if no one objects, i'd li
Reporter: Robert Muir
Assignee: Robert Muir
Attachments: LUCENE-2388.patch
The unversioned site needs to point to the new merged trunk.
Currently it points to the closed-off dead trunk in two different places.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854967#action_12854967
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1709:
-
Thanks Tom, this is exactly what happene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1709?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854959#action_12854959
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1709:
-
Thanks Tom and Shai... sorry I haven'
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854906#action_12854906
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2384:
-
bq. For JFlex this does not help as the J
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2384?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854902#action_12854902
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2384:
-
If tokenizers like StandardTokenizer just
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12854209#action_12854209
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2302:
-
bq. I will create a patch with option #2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853918#action_12853918
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2370:
-
bq. we did not miss a change to trunk in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2302?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853905#action_12853905
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2302:
-
bq. Token now implemnts CharSequence
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853838#action_12853838
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2369:
-
Toke, I still think it would be better to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2265:
Attachment: LUCENE-2265.patch
ok I think i made some serious progress here, but i did find a bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2265:
Attachment: LUCENE-2265.patch
this is mike's patch + my patch + quick hack attempt... mos
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2368?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853686#action_12853686
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2368:
-
Yes, we should just go ahead and do this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2265:
Attachment: LUCENE-2265_utf32.patch
attached is a totally scary patch to convert the entire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-2265:
Attachment: LUCENE-2265_pare.patch
as i looked at this, i noticed some unused functionality
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853013#action_12853013
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2265:
-
{quote}
Hm.
I'd say that your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853008#action_12853008
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2265:
-
bq. I mean, high-level, users don't c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2265?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12853007#action_12853007
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-2265:
-
{quote}
So? You aren't making som
1 - 100 of 1934 matches
Mail list logo
