[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12652808#action_12652808
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-1390:
---
>From my brief reading, it seems that &qu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1360?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-1360:
--
Attachment: ShortFieldNormSimilarity.java
> A Similarity class which has unique length norms
sue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Sean Timm
Priority: Trivial
Attachments: ShortFieldNormSimilarity.java
A Similarity class which extends DefaultSimilarity and simply overrides
lengthNorm. lengthNorm is implemented as a lookup for numTerms <= 10, else as
{{1/sqrt(nu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12600274#action_12600274
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-1026:
---
bq. 2. Logger.isLoggable is supposed to be fa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568280#action_12568280
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
"If there are no more major concerns I thin
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12566171#action_12566171
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
Doron, your comment for setResolution(long) says
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12565906#action_12565906
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
Paul,
I think that if we were to
ues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Sean Timm
>Priority: Minor
> Attachments: HitCollectorTimeoutDecorator.java,
> LuceneTimeoutTest.java, LuceneTimeoutTest.java,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
Patch adds JUnit test cases as suggested by Doren.
> Add search time
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12563632#action_12563632
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
I could go either way on the System.currentTimeMi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
This is a minor update to timeout.patch which fixes the comment about updates
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12563155#action_12563155
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
@Timo: "didn't I use a volatil
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562952#action_12562952
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
You are right that I forgot to change the com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12562869#action_12562869
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
Andrzej--
JLS 17.7 Non-atomic Treatment of do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: TimerThreadTest.java
The TimerThreadTest illustrates the accuracy of the TimerThread under
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: LuceneTimeoutTest.java
Updated to work with latest patch.
> Add search timeout support
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
Updated bad patch with good copy.
Created a patch using Timo&#
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: (was: timeout.patch)
> Add search timeout support to Luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
Created a patch using Timo's HitCollectorTimeoutDecorator. This patch
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12553586
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
Thanks for all of the feedback. I'll take another stab at this. I
See LUCENE-997
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
-Sean
Moreno Carullo wrote:
Hi all,
I'm going to implement a way to start a search on Lucene with a user-defined
timeout.
This is really useful when you have to deal with very strict SLA, and for
what I have seen from the source co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12542675
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
> I think my preference for the API and implementation would be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
Two issues are addressed in this latest patch:
1) Timeout support was not
Roy,
Thanks for the review and comments. My comments inline below.
Roy Ward wrote:
(1) You only added timeouts to:
public TopDocs search(Weight weight, Filter filter, final int nDocs)
It's confusing if timeout functionality is not also added to:
public TopFieldDocs search(Weight weight,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: (was: timeout.patch)
> Add search timeout support to Luc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05236.html
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12527264
]
Sean Timm commented on LUCENE-997:
--
Here are some additional details on the changes.
New files
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: LuceneTimeoutTest.java
Simple test case. Run by passing in the index directory as an
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-997:
-
Attachment: timeout.patch
Patch against trunk revision 575451.
> Add search timeout support to Luc
Add search timeout support to Lucene
Key: LUCENE-997
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-997
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Reporter: Sean Timm
Is this the paper that you are refering to?
A. Chowdhury, D. Grossman, O. Frieder, C. McCabe, "Document
Normalization Revisited" , ACM-SIGIR, August 2002.
http://ir.iit.edu/~abdur/publications/p381-chowdhury.pdf
-Sean
Doron Cohen wrote on 6/30/2007, 4:56 AM:
> In particular for TREC
> data,
HashMap defaults to 16, but ArrayList defaults to 10. He probably got
those confused. I'm not sure how Sun came up with the default values.
-Sean
Mark Miller (JIRA) wrote:
A friend was recently telling me that ArrayList defaulted to 16, but it does
not -- it defaults to 10. He must have bee
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-913?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Sean Timm updated LUCENE-913:
-
Summary: Two consecutive score() calls return different scores for Boolean
Queries. (was: Two
Andi Vajda wrote on 5/18/2007, 9:50 PM:
> As the maintainer of the contrib/db tree, I should point out that indeed,
> the bdb part depends on a C release of Sleepycat's (now Oracle)
> Berkeley DB.
Would it make sense to migrate to the BDB Java Edition?
http://www.oracle.com/database/berkeley-
In the brief test I did indexing 500K documents and optimizing every 10K
documents, I found that indexing is constant time (flat) and optimize()
time increases linearly.
-Sean
Grant Ingersoll wrote on 4/18/2007, 4:29 PM:
> Has anyone done in benchmarking to approximate how long it takes to
>
35 matches
Mail list logo
