r, and
> MockRAMDirectory.close asserts that all open files had been closed.
> I think it's a fairly minor failure ... I'll try to get to the bottom
> of it.
>
> Mike
>
> On Jan 24, 2008, at 5:14 PM, Slava Imeshev wrote:
>
> > Maybe the bui
Maybe the build accumulates state. I have set it to do a clean checkout every
time the build runs.
Hope this helps.
Slava
--- Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Failure is this:
>
> [junit] Testsuite: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriter
> [junit] Tests run: 56, Failures: 0,
ne.
At any rate, please let me know if you'd want to get Parabuild license for ASF.
I'll be happy to
contribute my time to help with set up.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
> But I am also open to other suggestions. I think other ASF projects
> are using Bamboo. And, as always, th
Parabuild as a permanent
solution?
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
--- Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Note: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1002 covers these
> two issues to the extent that they are breaking the nightly builds.
According to Parabuild, everyting is fine:
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/index.htm?displaygroupid=
5
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
This may be an infrastructure issue because according to Parabuild everything
is fine:
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/build/log.htm?logid=3405&buildrunid=2568
Slava
- Original Message -
From:
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 4:23 PM
Subject: Lucene nightly build failu
Raman,
Lucene is built and tested under Linux here:
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/index.htm?displaygroupid=5
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
- Original Message -
From: "Raman Kaur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 7:54 PM
Subject: jdks and o
Viewtier has also volunteered to provide Continuous Integration
and nightly builds for Lucene (running under Parabuild):
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/index.htm?displaygroupid=5
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Cutting" <[EMAIL P
n builds
> These articles are over 3 years old or more, I think the large
> community that uses Maven says it is a worthwhile thing. I'm
> curious, Slava, how many of ViewTier's Parabuild clients use Maven,
> since your
Here is a couple of alternative points of view on Maven. Make
sure your kids are not reading this:
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=why_maven_sucks
http://www.jroller.com/page/fate/?anchor=maven_refresher_course
- Original Message -
From: "karl wettin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
S
Michael,
Sorry for the confusion. Please disregard this error. We are in
process of migrating to better hardware so this should get fixed soon.
Thank you.
Slava
--- Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> > This is not our nightly build. I'm not sure who is r
Michael,
Sorry for the confusion. Please disregard this error. We are in process
of migrating to better hardware so this should get fixed soon.
Thank you.
Slava
--- Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Forwarding to java-dev for help on what we should do about this
> particular
Grant,
Parabuild is currently running integration build and a daily build at
http://parabuild.viewtier.com:8080/parabuild/index.htm?displaygroupid=5
Viewtier intends to keep supporting Lucene.
Regards,
Slava Imeshev
--- "Grant Ingersoll (JIRA)" <[EMAIL PROT
13 matches
Mail list logo
