The filed this as patent, too:
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0228528.html

Regards

Uwe Goetzke

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:a...@getopt.org] 
Gesendet: Montag, 29. März 2010 14:50
An: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Incremental Field Updates

On 2010-03-29 12:26, Michael McCandless wrote:
> I agree this is a long overdue feature... we need to get it into
> Lucene somehow.
>
> I like the Layers analogy... I think that will work well with Lucene's
> transactional semantics, ie a prior commit point would continue to see
> the index before the updates but new commit points would see the
> updates.

I'm coming late to this discussion ... are you guys familiar with this 
paper? It seems to describe the same model of incremental field-level 
updates, and the algo operates on internal Lucene ids:

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1458171


-- 
Best regards,
Andrzej Bialecki     <><
  ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _   __________________________________
[__ || __|__/|__||\/|  Information Retrieval, Semantic Web
___|||__||  \|  ||  |  Embedded Unix, System Integration
http://www.sigram.com  Contact: info at sigram dot com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org

Reply via email to