The filed this as patent, too: http://www.freepatentsonline.com/y2009/0228528.html
Regards Uwe Goetzke -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: Andrzej Bialecki [mailto:a...@getopt.org] Gesendet: Montag, 29. März 2010 14:50 An: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Betreff: Re: Incremental Field Updates On 2010-03-29 12:26, Michael McCandless wrote: > I agree this is a long overdue feature... we need to get it into > Lucene somehow. > > I like the Layers analogy... I think that will work well with Lucene's > transactional semantics, ie a prior commit point would continue to see > the index before the updates but new commit points would see the > updates. I'm coming late to this discussion ... are you guys familiar with this paper? It seems to describe the same model of incremental field-level updates, and the algo operates on internal Lucene ids: http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1458171 -- Best regards, Andrzej Bialecki <>< ___. ___ ___ ___ _ _ __________________________________ [__ || __|__/|__||\/| Information Retrieval, Semantic Web ___|||__|| \| || | Embedded Unix, System Integration http://www.sigram.com Contact: info at sigram dot com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org