On Mon, Mar 15, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Ryan McKinley wrote:
>>
>> Personally I'd prefer we just stop adding them, and the current ones work
>> their way up like normal if they are so inclined, or the ones that are not
>> even around anymore can just stay as they are.
>>
That sounds reasonable to me too
>
> Personally I'd prefer we just stop adding them, and the current ones work
> their way up like normal if they are so inclined, or the ones that are not
> even around anymore can just stay as they are.
>
This seems reasonable to me.
--
My 2 cents as one who has no aspirations of ever being a committer.
I think with the pending re-org of contrib and the value of contrib, it
doesn't make much sense to have the distinction between core and contrib
let alone for contributors.
Regarding the former low bar, either prune the list
On Mar 15, 2010, at 1:25 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/15/2010 08:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> Right, Mark. I think we would be effectively raising the bar to some extent
>> for what it takes to be a committer.
>
> That's part of my point though - some are contrib committers with a lower
On 03/15/2010 08:33 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Right, Mark. I think we would be effectively raising the bar to some extent
for what it takes to be a committer.
That's part of my point though - some are contrib committers with a
lower bar - now they are core/solr committers with that lower ba
On Mar 14, 2010, at 6:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>
>
> On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>
>>> This time a +1 without discuss :-)
>>>
>> Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
>>
>
> I had a whole s
On Mar 14, 2010, at 8:25 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
>> On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>>
>>>
This time a +1 without discuss :-)
>>>
>>> Yeah, but Uwe
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 5:47 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/14/2010 06:37 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 14, 2010, at 2:03 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> This time a +1 without discuss :-)
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, but Uwe, the thread was DISCUSS, not VOTE! :-)
>>
>
> I had a whole spiel a
Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
-Original Message-
From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Grant
Ingersoll
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 5:54 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: [DISCUSS] Do away with Co
;
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:gsi...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Grant
>> Ingersoll
>> Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2010 5:54 PM
>> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Do away with Contrib Committers and make core
&g
: Subject: [DISCUSS] Do away with Contrib Committers and make core committers
+1
-Hoss
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
On 2010-03-14 17:53, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with
the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically
speaking, this would make all existing contrib committers be core
5:54 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Do away with Contrib Committers and make core
> committers
>
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we
> should do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and
> jus
+1
Michael
On 3/14/10 9:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do away with
the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone be committers. Practically
speaking, this would make all existing contrib commi
+1
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 12:53 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should
> do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have
> everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existing
> c
+1
Mike
On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should
> do away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have
> everyone be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existin
Given the notion of "one project, one set of committers", I think we should do
away with the notion of contrib committers for java-dev and just have everyone
be committers. Practically speaking, this would make all existing contrib
committers be core committers. I think the notion of contrib c
17 matches
Mail list logo
