[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728141#action_12728141 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- IndexReader.reopen() solves my use case for wanting

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728120#action_12728120 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- found my problem, i wasn't doing a commit() after t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728113#action_12728113 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- Actually, it looks like i am seeing 2 separate segm

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728109#action_12728109 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- Looks like its actually a SegmentReader old index:

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728104#action_12728104 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- I'm working in lucene 2.4, so i don't have access t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728100#action_12728100 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1721: -- This is presumably a MultiReader that is retu

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728098#action_12728098 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- reopen() actually doesn't do the trick the followi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727695#action_12727695 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- That looks like its pretty close, and is definitely

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727683#action_12727683 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1721: -- bq. Absolutely nothing would have to have act

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727646#action_12727646 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- Absolutely nothing would have to have actually chan

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727641#action_12727641 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1721: -- bq. but some custom caches may not work on a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727639#action_12727639 ] Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1721: -- I'm still of the somewhat naive opini

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727623#action_12727623 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- bq. Sounds like you could perhaps use reopen() or t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727620#action_12727620 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1721: -- bq. obviously, this is rather impractical as

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727614#action_12727614 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- One thing that would be nice to see is a boolean re

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12727610#action_12727610 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1721: Right, a merge can commit at any

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725141#action_12725141 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- i suppose even that approach would cause problems i

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725140#action_12725140 ] Tim Smith commented on LUCENE-1721: --- how about a delete method on the IndexWriter that t

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1721) IndexWriter to allow deletion by doc ids

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1721?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12725109#action_12725109 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1721: This is a frequently requested fe