phi.de
_
From: Jorge Handl [mailto:jha...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2009 2:02 AM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
Anybody knows other interesting open-source s
On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
>
http://hounder.org
he.org
> Sent: Monday, July 6, 2009 11:06:14 AM
> Subject: A Comparison of Open Source Search Engines
>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
>
> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
hing the experiment did not mention is that Lucene handles
> incremental
> > updates, whereas many of the other "competitors" do not. So the indexing
> > performance comparison is not really fair.
> > -John
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:06 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> Anybody knows other interesting open-source search engines?
Minion (https://minion.dev.java.net/)
- Original Message
> From: Earwin Burrfoot
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Monday, 6 July, 2009 23:01:52
> Subject: Re: A Comparison of Open Source Search E
>>
>>
>> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
>>
>> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
>> this "shootout&qu
>
> http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
>
> I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
> this "shootout".
> The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is
http://zooie.wordpress.com/2009/07/06/a-comparison-of-open-source-search-engines-and-indexing-twitter/
I imagine many of you already saw this -- Lucene does pretty well in
this "shootout".
The only area it tended to lag, it seems, is memory usage and speed in
