: Guess suggesting to use this in user-list replies would be considered "over
: advertising", but too late at least for
: http://www.nabble.com/Best-way-to-returning-hits-after-search--tf3304485.html
I think the good baseline is to compare it with HitCollector ... it's hte
kind of thing that need
>
> : Guess there are no reservations on the subject; I'll enhance the
> : documentation of this mechanism.
>
> Sorry ... i'm a little behind on my mail ...
I think I know what you mean...
> I wouldn't go advertising it *too* heavily ... i think directly using
> FieldCache is definitely an "Exper
: Guess there are no reservations on the subject; I'll enhance the
: documentation of this mechanism.
Sorry ... i'm a little behind on my mail ...
I wouldn't go advertising it *too* heavily ... i think directly using
FieldCache is definitely an "Expert" level thing, and we tend to keep the
docum
Guess there are no reservations on the subject; I'll enhance the
documentation of this mechanism.
>
> Hi,
>
> I am wondering about the exposure (or not) of FieldCache in the
> documentation. FieldCache is used by Lucene, internally, for sort
purposes.
> Being an interface, it is also exposed as pu
Hi,
I am wondering about the exposure (or not) of FieldCache in the
documentation. FieldCache is used by Lucene, internally, for sort purposes.
Being an interface, it is also exposed as public API, but there seems to be
no pointers/documentation suggesting to use it. Well, except for a brief
ment
