On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 1:50 AM, Shay Banon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Yonik Seeley
>> It really shouldn't be heavily used.
>> For a sorted search, get() is called once per segment in the index.
>> There is no synchronization to retrieve per-document values.
>
> Sorting is not the
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 5:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Shay Banon wrote:
> >I would like to try and improve concurrency in Lucene in several
> places,
> > and thought I would start with FieldCacheImpl. The implementation is
> heavily
> > synchronized on both a
On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Shay Banon wrote:
> I would like to try and improve concurrency in Lucene in several places,
> and thought I would start with FieldCacheImpl. The implementation is heavily
> synchronized on both a global map and on creation values for a pretty
> heavily used pat
Hi,
I would like to try and improve concurrency in Lucene in several places,
and thought I would start with FieldCacheImpl. The implementation is heavily
synchronized on both a global map and on creation values for a pretty
heavily used path (get). I think the weak hash map is a good solution (
