RE: Lucene 2.9 release size

2009-08-27 Thread Chris Hostetter
: This prompts the question (in my mind anyway): should source releases include third-party binary jars? if i remember correctly, the historical argument has been that this way the source release contains everything you need to compile the source. except that if i remember correctly (and i'm v

Re: Lucene 2.9 release size

2009-08-27 Thread Mark Miller
Sounds like a good idea. Robert Muir wrote: > collation could be made smaller, it probably uses entire icu4j jar, > which includes large data pieces unnecessary for collation > > it this sounds like a good idea i will create a smaller one with the below > link: > > http://apps.icu-project.org/dat

RE: Lucene 2.9 release size

2009-08-27 Thread Steven A Rowe
Hi Mark, On 8/29/2009 at 4:24 PM, Mark Miller wrote: > It looks like 2.9 will be a much larger release. The 2.4.1 src dist I > have is 5.9MB zipped - the 2.9 version is 15.3 MB zipped. [snip] > collation 0 -> 5.5 The source code under collation is much smaller than 5.5MB - this must mostly be

Re: Lucene 2.9 release size

2009-08-27 Thread Robert Muir
collation could be made smaller, it probably uses entire icu4j jar, which includes large data pieces unnecessary for collation it this sounds like a good idea i will create a smaller one with the below link: http://apps.icu-project.org/datacustom/ On Thu, Aug 27, 2009 at 4:23 PM, Mark Miller wro

Lucene 2.9 release size

2009-08-27 Thread Mark Miller
It looks like 2.9 will be a much larger release. The 2.4.1 src dist I have is 5.9MB zipped - the 2.9 version is 15.3 MB zipped. It all looks legit to me though. I'll post a list of the biggest changes so someone can flag if they think something is off. It appears legit to me though: src dist 2.4.