eier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> --
>
> *From:* Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:54 PM
>
> *To:* java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: NoLockFact
: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:54 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: NoLockFactory does not have a private ctor
ok so will you mark it deprecated that way?
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
Hi Shai,
It exists, auto-generated by the compiler! But for deprecating and
--
>
> *From:* Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:26 PM
>
> *To:* java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* Re: NoLockFactory does not have a private ctor
>
>
>
> So you believe someone actually does "n
-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
_
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 2:26 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: NoLockFactory does not have a private ctor
So you believe someone actually does &quo
mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 02, 2009 1:11 PM
> *To:* java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> *Subject:* NoLockFactory does not have a private ctor
>
>
>
> NoLockFactory documents in its javadocs that one should call the static
> getNoLockFactory() in order
://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
_
From: Shai Erera [mailto:ser...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 1:11 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: NoLockFactory does not have a private ctor
NoLockFactory documents in its javadocs that one should call the static
NoLockFactory documents in its javadocs that one should call the static
getNoLockFactory() in order to create an instance. The class however does
not have a private ctor, so someone can create another instance of it. This
is not a big deal though, because makeLock returns a static member. But it
lo
