Doug Cutting wrote on 11/13/2006 10:50 AM:
> Chuck Williams wrote:
>> I followed this same logic in ParallelWriter and got burned. My first
>> implementation (still the version submitted as a patch in jira) used
>> dynamic threads to add the subdocuments to the parallel subindexes
>> simultaneou
TED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, 13 November, 2006 9:50:28 PM
Subject: Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation
Chuck Williams wrote:
> I followed this same logic in ParallelWriter and got burned. My first
> implementation (still the version submitted as a patch in jira) us
Chuck Williams wrote:
I followed this same logic in ParallelWriter and got burned. My first
implementation (still the version submitted as a patch in jira) used
dynamic threads to add the subdocuments to the parallel subindexes
simultaneously. This hit a problem with abnormal native heap OOM's
Doug Cutting wrote on 11/03/2006 12:18 PM:
> Chuck Williams wrote:
>> Why would a thread pool be more controversial? Dynamically creating and
>> garbaging threads has many downsides.
>
> The JVM already pools native threads, so mostly what's saved by thread
> pools is the allocation & initializati
.apache.org
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2006 11:54:56 AM
Subject: RE: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation
Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed?
Thanks,
Gus Holcomb
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2
Chuck Williams wrote:
Why would a thread pool be more controversial? Dynamically creating and
garbaging threads has many downsides.
The JVM already pools native threads, so mostly what's saved by thread
pools is the allocation & initialization of new Thread instances. There
are also downsid
Chris Hostetter wrote on 11/03/2006 09:40 AM:
> : Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed?
>
> I don't think i'll incite too much rioting to say "no there is no
> timeline"
> .. I may incite some rioting by saying "my guess is 1.5 packages will be
> supported when the patch
e rioting by saying "my guess is 1.5 packages will be
supported when the patches requiring them become highly desired.
: -Original Message-
: From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:08 PM
: To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
: Subject: Re: P
Gus Holcomb wrote:
We are currently using Lucene 1.9.1 at work. Using a profiler, I
discovered that searching with a HitCollector in a ParallelMultiSearcher
is single threaded. By extending ParallelMultiSearcher I was able to
parallelize it without a problem (and without requiring a new lucene
Is there any timeline for when Java 1.5 packages will be allowed?
Thanks,
Gus Holcomb
-Original Message-
From: Chris Hostetter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 8:08 PM
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: ParallelMultiSearcher reimplementation
Hi Gus
Hi Gus,
: Is this development already taking place in the trunk? I was unable to
: uncover any progress in this area. I haven't contributed to lucene (or
: any open source project) before, but I would be willing to clean up a
: number of things in this area if there was interest.
I'm not aware o
Hello everyone,
We are currently using Lucene 1.9.1 at work. Using a profiler, I
discovered that searching with a HitCollector in a ParallelMultiSearcher
is single threaded. By extending ParallelMultiSearcher I was able to
parallelize it without a problem (and without requiring a new lucene jar
f
12 matches
Mail list logo
