I think, once we can efficiently apply cheap random-access docIDSets
the way deleted docs are applied (ie, distribute down to all
SegmentTermDocs) then it'd be useful for this filter manager to also
pre-fold deletes in, such that SegmentTermDocs would only have a
single random-access docIDSet to ch
Thanks Paul !
I'll work such a utility (which takes a Filter and reads it into an
OpenBitSet, SortedVIntList) and then post back in case you'll be interested
in adopting it, and change CWF to use it, or something else.
Shai
On Tue, Jun 2, 2009 at 9:35 PM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> On Tuesday 02 Ju
On Tuesday 02 June 2009 16:39:06 Shai Erera wrote:
> Hi
>
> I read CWF today and initially I thought this is going to cache a Filter
> in-memory for me, so that I can more efficiently use it for subsequent
> searches. But I learned that all it does is cache the DocIdSet returned by
> the wrapped F
Hi
I read CWF today and initially I thought this is going to cache a Filter
in-memory for me, so that I can more efficiently use it for subsequent
searches. But I learned that all it does is cache the DocIdSet returned by
the wrapped Filter.
This is good in and on itself, but I wonder if we shoul
