Committed!
Doron
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:39 PM, Mark Miller wrote:
> Please commit the sim scoring javadoc improvements and I'll make the
> voting artifacts (quite possibly today).
>
Please commit the sim scoring javadoc improvements and I'll make the
voting artifacts (quite possibly today).
--
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com
Doron Cohen wrote:
> hi guys,
> Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty
> about the process, so a quick question
: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 1:19 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Cc: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 RC4 now available for testing
>
> The vote will be on the final artifacts - the final artifacts will
> just contain the javadoc cha
The vote will be on the final artifacts - the final artifacts will
just contain the javadoc changes.
- Mark
http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile)
On Sep 15, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Grant Ingersoll
wrote:
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22
On Sep 15, 2009, at 5:53 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Doron Cohen
wrote:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
The tentative consensus so far is that we are free to make javadocs
only changes w/o rolling a new RC.
AIUI, the
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 12:22 AM, Doron Cohen wrote:
> Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
The tentative consensus so far is that we are free to make javadocs
only changes w/o rolling a new RC.
Mike
--
@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: Lucene 2.9 RC4 now available for testing
hi guys,
Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty about
the process, so a quick question:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
There are 3 such open issues marked for
hi guys,
Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty about
the process, so a quick question:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
There are 3 such open issues marked for 2.9:
- LECENE-1908 (Similarity scoring jdocs) that is ready and I would lik
n and kick the
tires. If all goes well, we hope to release the final version of
Lucene 2.9 very shortly.
We let out a bug in the lock factory changes we made in RC3 -
making a new SimpleFSDirectory with a String param would throw
an illegal state exception - a fix for this is in RC4. We also
too
To be nit picky - I think its been 2.5 weeks.
I feel pretty good about 2.9 myself at this point though.
Mark Miller wrote:
> We certainly could - only thought I would have is that we do want RC4 to
> get a little exposure if possible (though at this point, I don't see
> more than
We certainly could - only thought I would have is that we do want RC4 to
get a little exposure if possible (though at this point, I don't see
more than a couple days being needed, and we have had one or two).
I'll go when you guys say go.
- Mark
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> We coul
all goes well, we hope to release the final version of
> Lucene 2.9 very shortly.
>
> We let out a bug in the lock factory changes we made in RC3 -
> making a new SimpleFSDirectory with a String param would throw
> an illegal state exception - a fix for this is in RC4. We also
&
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:43 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RC4
>
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> > I hope, this time we find possible traps/errors
> > *before* releasing RC4
>
> Yeah, there was an older Solr issue open
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I hope, this time we find possible traps/errors
> *before* releasing RC4
Yeah, there was an older Solr issue open for this too:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1404
Just didn't come across it and recognize it as a Luce
nal Message-
> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, September 11, 2009 4:16 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: RC4
>
> Just let me know when you feel comfortable and I'll start the tests and
> transfer.
>
> - Mark
ible traps/errors
> *before* releasing RC4.
>
> Uwe
>
> -
> Uwe Schindler
> H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
> http://www.thetaphi.de
> eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
I am finished win LUCENE-1906!
I also opened an issue for Solr: Maybe there are changes needed for
correctOffset after 2.9RC4. I hope, this time we find possible traps/errors
*before* releasing RC4.
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u
Well I'm ready - but I'm just going to wait till the morning - lot of
activity early in the morn (EST), so best to do it after that.
- Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Mark Miller [mailto:markrmil...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 9:43 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: RC4
>
> Yonik mentioned that RC3 broke Solr.
>
> It looks like we are going to need an RC4.
>
>
> /**
>* Instantiate using the pro
Yonik mentioned that RC3 broke Solr.
It looks like we are going to need an RC4.
/**
* Instantiate using the provided directory name (String).
* @param lockDirName where lock files should be created.
*/
public SimpleFSLockFactory(String lockDirName) throws IOException {
lockDir
20 matches
Mail list logo
