here is a great link for this topic:
http://www.icu-project.org/docs/papers/supplementaries_iuc21.ppt
so you see it wouldn't be that invasive, and of course you can still
use char[], with some minor modifications to how you process text in
certain places.
its the parameters that take single char,
in general most stuff will be ok (code just doesnt mess with the
surrogate pairs)
simple example: things like lowercase filter are not, and
lowercasetokenizer, well, can't fix that since its super
chartokenizer, works on char.
i hope this doesnt sound bad, but in general the transition is simple
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 9:09 AM, Robert Muir wrote:
>>
>> 3.0 will then be a mechanical release: "simply" remove all deprecated
>> APIs, fix all core, contrib, tests to not use those APIs, release, and
>> immediately begin accepting 1.5 patches.
>>
>
> personally, I wonder if anyone but me is inter
>
> 3.0 will then be a mechanical release: "simply" remove all deprecated
> APIs, fix all core, contrib, tests to not use those APIs, release, and
> immediately begin accepting 1.5 patches.
>
personally, I wonder if anyone but me is interested in correcting the
issue that unicode character no long
Thanks guys!
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
>
>> hey there,
>> I see a lot of emails going on about 3.0, getting ready for Java 1.5 (
>> I guess enums, generics etc) and discussions about back-compat policy.
>> I'm cu
On Jun 12, 2009, at 3:50 AM, Simon Willnauer wrote:
hey there,
I see a lot of emails going on about 3.0, getting ready for Java 1.5 (
I guess enums, generics etc) and discussions about back-compat policy.
I'm curious if there is a kind of a roadmap or a document where I can
get up-to-date with
g. Eclipse.
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> From: Michael McCandless [mailto:luc...@mikemccandless.com]
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 12:33 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org; simon.willna...@gmail.com
> Subject: Re: 3.0,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Simon
Willnauer wrote:
> I'm curious if there is a kind of a roadmap or a document where I can
> get up-to-date with all those targets and especially what we want to
> achieve in 3.0.
I don't think we have such a doc...
I think "the plan" at this point is quite s
