> > For me it would not be a problem, I would use a FilteredTermEnum and
> > subclass it, but would only implement next() and the other abstract
> methods
> > would be dummies (including difference() returning 1.0f). Only the enum
> and
> > the term should have a protected access or a getter in thi
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Uwe Schindler wrote:
> For me it would not be a problem, I would use a FilteredTermEnum and
> subclass it, but would only implement next() and the other abstract methods
> would be dummies (including difference() returning 1.0f). Only the enum and
> the term shou
> > MultiTermQuery has in its protected getEnum() returning
> FilteredTermEnum.
> > For TrieRange, the return should be changed to TermEnum, it is not
> needed to
> > have a FilteredTermEnum (FilteredTermEnum is only an implementation, the
> > method should return an abstract TermEnum). If this is
Uwe Schindler wrote:
MultiTermQuery has in its protected getEnum() returning FilteredTermEnum.
For TrieRange, the return should be changed to TermEnum, it is not needed to
have a FilteredTermEnum (FilteredTermEnum is only an implementation, the
method should return an abstract TermEnum). If this
