Chris Hostetter wrote:
I stumbled upon this the other day...
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/java/nightly/
...i don't know which host it runs on, or whether commiting changes to the
nightly.sh will automatically put them into effect (or if it needs checked
out somewhere)
These are
: So, the upshot of this is we should not update docs on the site until
: there is a release? Still, I think it would be nice to have a trunk
: version hosted somewhere (as has been echoed by others) on the site
+1
it sounds like we need to revert the docs at
http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs
So, the upshot of this is we should not update docs on the site until
there is a release? Still, I think it would be nice to have a trunk
version hosted somewhere (as has been echoed by others) on the site
that could contain the nightly build docs. I can setup the links in
the docs if so
but i feel like the "default" should be the most bleeding
edge stuff so more people can spot mistakes or ask questions
about things
that are confusing.
In my experience, having API reference docs built out of trunk is very
uncommon. In fact, I don't think I've ever seen it,
: 1. Site documentation is generated as part of Lucene build, and is
: versioned with Lucene.
: 2. Wiki documentation is not versioned with Lucene, and unrelated to the
: build.
: 3. Improvements to documentation would be nice to have in the public site
: (e.g. scoring) even before released.
: 4.
Things get complicated because of relations/links between javadocs and
other documentation.
1. Site documentation is generated as part of Lucene build, and is
versioned with Lucene.
2. Wiki documentation is not versioned with Lucene, and unrelated to the
build.
3. Improvements to documentation wou
Doug Cutting wrote:
Actually the've typically been the current release. Hadoop updated its
javadocs nightly before its first release, but now they're the current
release. Solr may update it's nightly, but then it doesn't yet have any
releases. And Nutch and Lucene's hosted javadocs are tradi
Yonik Seeley wrote:
Yes, the JavaDocs for Lucene, Solr, Hadoop, Nutch are populated during
the nightly build process.
Actually the've typically been the current release. Hadoop updated its
javadocs nightly before its first release, but now they're the current
release. Solr may update it's n
On 10/30/06, Chris Hostetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:>
i thought there was a cron that took care of doing that on a regular
basis?
Yes, the JavaDocs for Lucene, Solr, Hadoop, Nutch are populated during
the nightly build process.
...perhaps the same cron that does/did the nightly builds? ...
> I _believe_ javadocs are for the latest released version (2.0).
I thought not, because they are titled "Lucene 2.1-dev API", and also
because they contain, e.g., LockFactory, which I think was not in 2.0.
-
To unsubscribe, e-m
: Hmmm, I updated them when I added in scoring docs (I kept the old
: directories around, though) and they were based on trunk at the time
: I did it. I wasn't aware of them being the latest released version,
: but I can restore them to that easily enough.
I believe they have allways been based
By the looks of http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/ReleaseTodo it
should be the latest release.However, this breaks some of the
links in the scoring documentation. Shall I revert the javadocs or
should I revert the scoring docs or should we just leave things as is
for now with the a
Hmmm, I updated them when I added in scoring docs (I kept the old
directories around, though) and they were based on trunk at the time
I did it. I wasn't aware of them being the latest released version,
but I can restore them to that easily enough.
It might be nice to have two versions of
: I _believe_ javadocs are for the latest released version (2.0).
No ... they say "Lucene 2.1-dev API" in the title, and where last modified
on October 10th ... several post 2.0 things are listed (like Fieldable).
Something definitely seems to have gone wrong in teh nightly generation
... but i
I _believe_ javadocs are for the latest released version (2.0).
Otis
- Original Message
From: Doron Cohen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 30, 2006 5:03:49 PM
Subject: site javadocs and resolved issue 678
I just noticed that current javadocs in
h
15 matches
Mail list logo