Duly noted. I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1059
Tzvika
On 11/19/07, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sure it fixes an issue. I think a JIRA issue is the best way to make
> sure this doesn't get lost.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Tzvika Barenho
Sure it fixes an issue. I think a JIRA issue is the best way to make
sure this doesn't get lost.
-Grant
On Nov 19, 2007, at 2:23 AM, Tzvika Barenholz wrote:
Hi Michael!
The patch is attached to my previous message (and this one too). It
doesn't actually fix an issue, so I don't see where
> functionality. In some cases strings are compared with string literals
> using ==. I can give a list if anyone thinks he or she will have use for
> it.
This is a speed optimization. All Strings compared by this function were
"interned" before. This is done for e.g. all "field" names in Lucene.
: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Subject: Re: some minor fixes
Hi Michael!
The patch is attached to my previous message (and this one too). It doesn't
actually fix an issue, so I don't see where to put it otherwise. Please
advise. *trying not to be difficult* :-)
T
On 11/18/0
Hi Michael!
The patch is attached to my previous message (and this one too). It doesn't
actually fix an issue, so I don't see where to put it otherwise. Please
advise. *trying not to be difficult* :-)
T
On 11/18/07, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Thank you! Yes please submi
Thank you! Yes please submit a patch and we can iterate from there.
Mike
"Tzvika Barenholz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello good people of Lucene!
>
> I've been using Lucene for a long while, but have only recently had occasion
> to checkout the source code from the trunk and build it mysel
