Yikes -- yes please do isolate the code & open an issue!
Mike
"Andi Vajda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> > I see 3 issues open against 2.3 still, plus 1 that are open against 2.2
> >
> > I think the biggest issue before releasing is our confiden
"Grant Ingersoll" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 25, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> >> Do we want to start thinking about 2.3 release in the next month or
> >> so, say by the end of September?
> >
> > +1
> >
> > I'd like to commit LUCENE-845/847/870: I think those issues a
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
I see 3 issues open against 2.3 still, plus 1 that are open against 2.2
I think the biggest issue before releasing is our confidence in the major
changes related to DocumentsWriter and the merge stuff, right?
Do we want to try to set a date for a
On Aug 25, 2007, at 8:54 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
Do we want to start thinking about 2.3 release in the next month or
so, say by the end of September?
+1
I'd like to commit LUCENE-845/847/870: I think those issues are not
too far being committable. I'll go mark them 2.3.
So, I see t
Hi Grant,
The Hadoop-Patch process script is now re-written and should be
easier to clone.
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/hadoop/nightly/
hudsonBuildHadoopPatch.sh?view=markup
and
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/lucene/hadoop/nightly/
processHadoopPatchEmail.sh?revision=575463&view=mar
> Do we want to start thinking about 2.3 release in the next month or
> so, say by the end of September?
+1
I'd like to commit LUCENE-845/847/870: I think those issues are not
too far being committable. I'll go mark them 2.3.
> I propose this time around, during our freeze cycle, we take a good
