OK put it up! Sounds good :)
Mike
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>
> On Mar 23, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
>
>> You can implement just the "out of order" collector, since it subsumes
>> the in-order case, and all will work fine.
>>
>> However, if the co
On Mar 23, 2010, at 1:20 PM, Michael McCandless wrote:
> You can implement just the "out of order" collector, since it subsumes
> the in-order case, and all will work fine.
>
> However, if the collector can save CPU when docs are known to arrive
> in-order (not all collectors can) it'd be good t
You can implement just the "out of order" collector, since it subsumes
the in-order case, and all will work fine.
However, if the collector can save CPU when docs are known to arrive
in-order (not all collectors can) it'd be good to make a separate
in-order one as well.
Mike
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010
