Initially it might, but probably eventually not. I was
thinking Lucene formats might also be bit more compact
than vanilla hash maps, but I guess that depends on
many factors. But I will probably want to play with
actual queries later on, based on frequencies.
OK.
In the latter case, are yo
--- Wolfgang Hoschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Tatu,
>
> I take it that simply maintaining the frequencies in
> a hashmap
> similar to
>
org.apache.lucene.index.memory.AnalyzerUtil.getMostFrequentTerms()
>
> isn't sufficient for your usecases?
Initially it might, but probably eventual
Hi Tatu,
I take it that simply maintaining the frequencies in a hashmap
similar to
org.apache.lucene.index.memory.AnalyzerUtil.getMostFrequentTerms()
isn't sufficient for your usecases?
In the latter case, are you using
org.apache.lucene.store.RAMDirectory or
org.apache.lucene.index.mem
