gt; > From: Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> > Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 4:56:14 PM
> > Subject: Re: Strange Exception
> >
> >
> > Some sort of index corruption seems likely. Is it expected that the
> > d
recommended burn-in tests for this machine, with spec focus on memory...
- Original Message
> From: Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 4:56:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Strange Exception
>
>
> Some sor
Message
> From: Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, 18 April, 2008 4:56:14 PM
> Subject: Re: Strange Exception
>
>
> Some sort of index corruption seems likely. Is it expected that the
> docs in this index only ha
Some sort of index corruption seems likely. Is it expected that the
docs in this index only have 2 fields? The exception is happening
because TermBuffer is trying to look up the field name for
fieldNumber=3.
What version of Lucene is this?
How was the index produced?
Were there any ot
