On Wednesday 27 December 2006 01:38, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I'd be surprised if anyone uses Lucli, given the limited utility it
> has versus using Luke.
It's actually very useful if you only have ssh access to a machine that has
no X11 running. I just fixed the small bug found by this review.
Brian,
Thanks for your continued efforts, and for this report about Lucli.
I'd be surprised if anyone uses Lucli, given the limited utility it
has versus using Luke.
Erik
On Dec 26, 2006, at 4:30 PM, Brian Chess wrote:
Hi there, I didn't see any replies to my question about what t
Hi there, I didn't see any replies to my question about what to do with
outside auditors for the Java Open Revew Project. Our default position is
that we do not allow access to outsiders without permission from the code
maintainers, so unless I hear otherwise, we won't grant access to outsiders
for
Brian Chess wrote:
My question is, would you like to allow outsiders to go through results and
help sort the real bugs from the chaff?
That's up to you. It's your service, not governed by the Apache Lucene
project. If you cause your system to add reasonable issues to our
bug-tracking system
: application vulnerable or is really just a "ruckus" issue? Part of
: me thinks that b/c the code is freely available, people could find
: the security issues anyway, so we aren't really protecting ourselves
: anyway by denying access.
Personally I agree ... if the source is free, all exposing
On Dec 19, 2006, at 12:16 AM, Brian Chess wrote:
My question is, would you like to allow outsiders to go through
results and
help sort the real bugs from the chaff? The upside is that
volunteers may
perform useful work and that it may be another avenue to get people
involved
with the co
