On Friday 14 October 2005 08:29, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> : A more general solution would be to use a subclass of BooleanQuery that
> : provides a Weight that flattens all the weights of the subqueries, for
example
> : to the maximum weight, and for the rest works like the usual Weight of
> : B
: A more general solution would be to use a subclass of BooleanQuery that
: provides a Weight that flattens all the weights of the subqueries, for example
: to the maximum weight, and for the rest works like the usual Weight of
: BooleanQuery.
I'm not grasping all of the ideas in this thread comp
On Thursday 13 October 2005 20:15, markharw00d wrote:
> Sounds like a very useful addition but as yet another variant of "term
> expanding" queries (fuzzy/prefix/range/wildcard) now might be a good
> time to re-raise the scoring issue I originally identified here with all
> such queries: http://
Sounds like a very useful addition but as yet another variant of "term
expanding" queries (fuzzy/prefix/range/wildcard) now might be a good
time to re-raise the scoring issue I originally identified here with all
such queries: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-329
The issue is that "
On Oct 13, 2005, at 7:36 AM, Mikko Noromaa wrote:
Hi,
It would be possible to do a PatternQuery("*") that would
enumerate every term.
Does this work differently than the current logic where wildcard
queries are
constructed as BooleanQueries with many terms OR'ed together? I
think this
Erik Hatcher [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 1:54 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: regex-based query contribution
>
>
>
> On Oct 13, 2005, at 3:15 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
> >> The main negative to this query, just lik
On Oct 13, 2005, at 3:15 AM, Paul Elschot wrote:
The main negative to this query, just like with WildcardQuery and
FuzzyQuery, is the possible performance issue. However, just like
WildcardQuery, this really depends on how clever the indexing side of
things is and matching that cleverness with
On Thursday 13 October 2005 01:44, Erik Hatcher wrote:
> I've developed normal and span-based Query implementations that use
> regex to match index terms rather than the simplified WildcardQuery.
> This allows for queries like "abc[0-9]xyz" that would match abc1xyz,
> but not abc12xyz for ex
