Re: First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-29 Thread Grant Ingersoll
I wouldn't worry about it too much. The binary distribution probably should just contain the built WAR (and Jetty?) and the source dist can have everything. -Grant On Nov 29, 2007, at 2:33 AM, markharw00d wrote: The 17 MB bundle I provided is essentially the source plus dependencies, the

Re: First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-28 Thread markharw00d
The 17 MB bundle I provided is essentially the source plus dependencies, the bulk of which is jars, mainly the compile-time dependency gwt-dev-windows.jar weighing in at 10MB. The built WAR file is only 1.5 meg. The WAR file bundled with Jetty (as a convenience) is 8 meg. It may be possible to

Re: First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-28 Thread Mark Miller
Yes, didn't mean jar, meant zip...or tar. I guess this may not be a sticky point for most people. For me, I just get knee jerk seeing the dist size quadruple for a feature, that is in reality a very small part of the dist. I am not arguing against adding it, just noting my stomach drop. Take

Re: First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-28 Thread Doug Cutting
Mark Miller wrote: My only concern is with the size increase this will give to the Lucene jar. Another 17 meg - yikes! You mean the release tar file, not the jar, right? Is the size of the release really an issue for folks? Doug -

Re: First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-28 Thread Mark Miller
Compiled and ran it on Vista. Very cool. I am also a huge GWT fan. This is a great start. Only issue I ran into was also the scrolling issue when selecting the drive...but based on the TODO: comments, it appears you have seen that. Grant: It doesn't ask permission to read your hard drive beca

Re: First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-28 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Seriously cool! On Nov 28, 2007, at 6:13 PM, markharw00d wrote: Any takers to test this contrib layout before I commit it? http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/webluke.zip This is a (17MB) zip file which you can unzip to a new "webluke" directory under your copy of lucene/contrib and then r

First cut at web-based Luke for contrib

2007-11-28 Thread markharw00d
Any takers to test this contrib layout before I commit it? http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/webluke.zip This is a (17MB) zip file which you can unzip to a new "webluke" directory under your copy of lucene/contrib and then run the usual Lucene Ant build ( or at least "ant build-contrib"). Y

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-14 Thread Jason Calabrese
Very nice. It would be able nice to set the browse path using a system property for convenience and security. Also I thought that I'd mention that you need a nightly build for this since 2.2 won't work. - To unsubscribe, e-mai

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-14 Thread markharw00d
Are there any licensing issues with GWT? (I've never used it) OK on that score I think : http://code.google.com/webtoolkit/terms.html - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-14 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Nov 14, 2007, at 1:26 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : Seems like a fine place to put it for now. But it really deserves a better : home than that. What about a new "client/luke" directory? (following on : Solr's structure). i'd vote to stick with contrib ... it's just easier on the bu

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-14 Thread Chris Hostetter
: Seems like a fine place to put it for now. But it really deserves a better : home than that. What about a new "client/luke" directory? (following on : Solr's structure). i'd vote to stick with contrib ... it's just easier on the build system. : > 3) What needs to change in the build process

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-14 Thread mark harwood
wid Weiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Sent: Wednesday, 14 November, 2007 4:55:22 PM Subject: Re: Web-based Luke > I'm putting together a Google Web Toolkit-based version of Luke: >http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/Luke.war This is neat, Mark! At first I

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-14 Thread Dawid Weiss
I'm putting together a Google Web Toolkit-based version of Luke: http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/Luke.war This is neat, Mark! At first I thought: darn, how the heck is he accessing the filesystem from JavaScript (GWT or otherwise)?! Then it became clear to me that it's actually the _

Re: Web-based Luke

2007-11-12 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Nov 12, 2007, at 1:21 PM, mark harwood wrote: I'm putting together a Google Web Toolkit-based version of Luke: http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/Luke.war ( Just add your version of lucene core jar to WEB-INF/lib subdirectory and you should have the basis of a web-enabled Luke.) Mark:

Web-based Luke

2007-11-12 Thread mark harwood
I'm putting together a Google Web Toolkit-based version of Luke: http://www.inperspective.com/lucene/Luke.war ( Just add your version of lucene core jar to WEB-INF/lib subdirectory and you should have the basis of a web-enabled Luke.) The intention behind this is to port Luke to a wholly Apach