OK great! I'll see what I can do from here.
Thanks!
On 12 Mar 2009, at 12:45, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 21:16, Candide Kemmler > wrote:
On 11 Mar 2009, at 23:21, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
Take ANTLR and roll your own query parser from scratch? It's
pretty easy.
Hi Ear
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 21:16, Candide Kemmler wrote:
>
> On 11 Mar 2009, at 23:21, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
>
>> Take ANTLR and roll your own query parser from scratch? It's pretty easy.
>>
>
> Hi Earwin,
>
> That would be fantastic, since our parser is already specified as an ANTLR
> grammar. Howe
On 11 Mar 2009, at 23:21, Earwin Burrfoot wrote:
Take ANTLR and roll your own query parser from scratch? It's pretty
easy.
Hi Earwin,
That would be fantastic, since our parser is already specified as an
ANTLR grammar. However, I can't seem to find an antlr grammar in the
lucene source
Take ANTLR and roll your own query parser from scratch? It's pretty easy.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2009 at 04:24, Candide Kemmler wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm looking at a way to extend the lucene query parser to allow for semantic
> computations in IEML space (see http://ieml.org). What I'd like to know is:
>
Hello,
I'm looking at a way to extend the lucene query parser to allow for
semantic computations in IEML space (see http://ieml.org). What I'd
like to know is: how difficult it would be to be able to add clauses
to query like: ... AND ( some_IEML_expression) AND ...
some_IEML_expression w
