@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:44:46 +0200
Subject: Re: lucene scoring
Александр Аристов wrote:
I want implement searching with ability to set so-called a confidence
level below which I would treat documents as garbage. I cannot defile
the level per query as the level should
Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:54:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Re[2]: lucene scoring
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Александр Аристов wrote:
I want implement searching with ability to set so-called a
confidence level below which I would treat documents
in two different queries have the same
quality (they contain the same set of found terms, lenght etc.)
Alexander
-Original Message-
From: Andrzej Bialecki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:44:46 +0200
Subject: Re: lucene scoring
Александр
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 15:54:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Re[2]: lucene scoring
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Александр Аристов wrote:
I want implement searching with ability to set so-called a
confidence level below which I would treat documents
Hi people
What is the best way to implement scoring so that it become possible to compare
scores obtained from different queries. Full problem description is here (clear
and short)
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.jakarta.lucene.user/10760/focus=10810
I know about possible usage of
My understanding is this is an area of research in Info. Retrieval in
general. There is some attempt at this with the query normalization
factor in the scoring model, but my understanding is one shouldn't
rely on it. You might try searching Google scholar (or MSN Academic
Live, which I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Thu, 7 Aug 2008 10:20:10 -0400
Subject: Re: lucene scoring
My understanding is this is an area of research in Info. Retrieval in
general. There is some attempt at this with the query normalization
factor in the scoring model, but my
On Aug 7, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Александр Аристов wrote:
I want implement searching with ability to set so-called a
confidence level below which I would treat documents as garbage. I
cannot defile the level per query as the level should be relevant
for all documents.
With current scoring
Александр Аристов wrote:
I want implement searching with ability to set so-called a confidence
level below which I would treat documents as garbage. I cannot defile
the level per query as the level should be relevant for all
documents.
Hmm .. I'm not sure if I understand it properly - if the
? Perhaps others have done similar
things.
-Grant
On Dec 4, 2006, at 7:24 AM, Sajid Khan wrote:
Hi all,
I need to add one more factor(like tf, idf .) in the lucene
scoring formula. But i am not getting any idea of where should i
update the
code in Lucene.
Can
Hi all,
I need to add one more factor(like tf, idf .) in the lucene
scoring formula. But i am not getting any idea of where should i update the
code in Lucene.
Can anybody please help me to solve the problem?
Ragards
Sajid Khan
--
View this message in context:
http
(like tf, idf .) in the lucene
scoring formula. But i am not getting any idea of where should i
update the
code in Lucene.
Can anybody please help me to solve the problem?
Ragards
Sajid Khan
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Regarding-
adding-one-more-factor
Otis wrote:
Short answer: no. Damn are those scoring classes hard to follow...
I have looked at these classes several times, including stepping through
them and I still find them confusing. Perhaps someone (Doug? pretty
please?) could illuminate us?
I think the part I always found
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:34 -0700, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
about the possibility of eliminating floating point calculations from
Lucene's scoring
Did you look in to this?
No, not yet. I did start looking at how exactly scoring works (debugger, step
through), but then had to switch to
Subject: Changing Lucene scoring?
Hi,
Not sure if people caught my question over on java-user@ about the possibility
of eliminating floating point calculations from Lucene's scoring. Before I
embark on this, I thought I'd ask:
- Am I crazy? Is this at all doable?
- Is this doable without
On Mon, 2006-05-08 at 18:34 -0700, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
Hi,
Not sure if people caught my question over on java-user@
about the possibility of eliminating floating point
calculations from Lucene's scoring. Before I embark on this,
I thought I'd ask:
- Am I crazy?
I'm all for a
Hi,
I'm not happy with the how scoring works either, it might be efficient
though. I have been investigating the code for a while. Everything gets
down to
-Query (TermQuery, BooleanQuery, PhraseQuery etc.),
-Inner class Weight in Query,
-Similarity,
-Scorer (TermScorer, BooleanScorer
On 5/8/06, Otis Gospodnetic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not sure if people caught my question over on java-user@ about the possibility
of eliminating floating point calculations from Lucene's scoring. Before I
embark on this, I thought I'd ask:
- Am I crazy? Is this at all doable?
Do you
: One of the reasons I am looking at this is because I often need just
: yes/no (matches/doesn't match) answers, and don't care for the score.
I didn't realize that was an option -- i thought you wanted integer
scoring, and the best advice i had for that was to search and replace.
But if you
19 matches
Mail list logo
