Re: non-overlapping Span queries

2006-12-08 Thread Paul Elschot
On Friday 08 December 2006 00:09, Chris Hostetter wrote: > > : > Brooklyn High which is in Brooklyn, NY > : > : That requires a minimum distance between the matches of the > : subqueries, and that is not yet implemented. > > I was about to suggest that adding that seems like it would be fairly >

Re: non-overlapping Span queries

2006-12-07 Thread Ruslan Sivak
Paul Elschot wrote: On Thursday 07 December 2006 22:57, Ruslan Sivak wrote: I see back in Jul 2005 there was a thread about SpanNearQueries which were overlapping. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-dev/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] A fix was posted by Paul Elsc

Re: non-overlapping Span queries

2006-12-07 Thread Chris Hostetter
: > Brooklyn High which is in Brooklyn, NY : : That requires a minimum distance between the matches of the : subqueries, and that is not yet implemented. I was about to suggest that adding that seems like it would be fairly easy, just add a new "int minDistance" to SpanNearQuery and then use it i

Re: non-overlapping Span queries

2006-12-07 Thread Paul Elschot
On Thursday 07 December 2006 22:57, Ruslan Sivak wrote: > I see back in Jul 2005 there was a thread about SpanNearQueries which > were overlapping. > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-dev/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > A fix was posted by Paul Elschot at that time. Did

non-overlapping Span queries

2006-12-07 Thread Ruslan Sivak
I see back in Jul 2005 there was a thread about SpanNearQueries which were overlapping. http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-dev/200507.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] A fix was posted by Paul Elschot at that time. Did this fix ever make it into 2.0? I'm having problems with SpanNear