Re: Javadocs and Nightly Builds was Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-05 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Ah, but the example in the first link shows all the items expanded... I will dig in... -Grant On Dec 4, 2007, at 9:59 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote: : I also have some Forrest questions. Does anyone know how to make it so that : the Documentation page is the default expanded page instead of

Re: Javadocs and Nightly Builds was Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-04 Thread Chris Hostetter
: I also have some Forrest questions. Does anyone know how to make it so that : the Documentation page is the default expanded page instead of About? : Similarly, how does one auto-expand a section? Ideally, I think we should : have the Documentation page expanded, and all items underneath it.

Javadocs and Nightly Builds was Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-04 Thread Grant Ingersoll
OK, I committed some changes: I introduced a new page called javadocs that contains links to 2.x builds of the javadocs and also tells people where to go find older versions of the javadocs (pre 2.x). This is now the main link from Documentation->javadocs. I moved the Nightly build javad

Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-03 Thread Doug Cutting
Grant Ingersoll wrote: http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/42616?search_string=javadocs%20nightly%20build contains the discussion on this from way back when. In that discussion I said that, "links to nightly builds should be confined to 'developer' portions of the site". Tha

Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: Grant Ingersoll wrote: Right, the javadocs are for the nightly build. See the Site Versions section of http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html for releases. Unreleased stuff should only be linked to in a "developer" section of the

Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-03 Thread Doug Cutting
Grant Ingersoll wrote: Right, the javadocs are for the nightly build. See the Site Versions section of http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html for releases. Unreleased stuff should only be linked to in a "developer" section of the website. Right now the primary javadoc links on the we

Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-01 Thread Grant Ingersoll
Right, the javadocs are for the nightly build. See the Site Versions section of http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html for releases. Also, these questions are best asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED] We try to keep java-dev for discussion of development of the actual library. Thanks! -G

Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-01 Thread Cauvery Developer
oh ! I saw them in the javadoc so I got confused. Thanks, Michael. Regards, Nags On Dec 1, 2007 3:05 PM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > These are new APIs, available only in the unreleased trunk (2.3-dev) > version > of Lucene. > > They are not present in 2.2. > > You

Re: setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-01 Thread Michael McCandless
Hi, These are new APIs, available only in the unreleased trunk (2.3-dev) version of Lucene. They are not present in 2.2. You can pull the nightly trunk build JAR from here: http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/290/artifact/artifacts/ (that's this AM's build). Bu

setRAMBufferSizeMB and DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter !

2007-12-01 Thread Cauvery Developer
Hi, I am having lucene-core-2.2.0.jar in my CLASSPATH. I do NOT see the method setRAMBufferSizeMB method and the field DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing from IndexWriter class. I looked into the source also and sure enough, these items do not exist. Is this a download issue ? Regards, Nags.