Hi, Paul,
Thanks for your email. I am not sure how the sqrt vs. constant for
skipInterval will pan out for two or multiple required terms. That needs
some experiments I guess.
Cheers,
Jian
On 10/16/05, Paul Elschot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jian,
> -- Fo
ECTED]>
> Date: Oct 15, 2005 6:36 PM
> Subject: skipInterval
> To: Lucene Developers List
>
> Hi, All,
>
> I was reading some research papers regarding quick inverted index lookups.
> The classical approach to skipping dictates that a skip should be positioned
> ev
Hi, All,
I should have sent to this email address rather than the old jakarta email
address. Sorry if double-posted.
Jian
-- Forwarded message --
From: jian chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Oct 15, 2005 6:36 PM
Subject: skipInterval
To: Lucene Developers List
Hi, All,
Hi, All,
I was reading some research papers regarding quick inverted index lookups.
The classical approach to skipping dictates that a skip should be positioned
every sqrt(df) document pointers.
I looked at the the current Lucene implementation. The skipInterval is
hardcoded as follows in
