Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-29 Thread mark harwood
An equivalent Parallelizer for IndexWriter would be a useful addition to keep the two indexes in synch. Hiding the details of which lucene index document data is retrieved from gives us some added flexibility in storage options but I've been thinking of a more general-purpose layer of abstraction

Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-29 Thread Paul Smith
Doug Cutting wrote: Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later. Would folks find this useful? My Answer: "Is the Pope German?" Very useful

Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-29 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Apr 28, 2005, at 5:19 PM, Doug Cutting wrote: Please find attached something I wrote today. It has not been yet tested extensively, and the documentation could be improved, but I thought it would be good to get comments sooner rather than later. Would folks find this useful? Should it go int

Re: Jakarta image on lucene.apache.org

2005-04-29 Thread Erik Hatcher
On Apr 28, 2005, at 6:03 PM, Daniel Naber wrote: On Thursday 28 April 2005 00:16, Daniel Naber wrote: This 'site' SVN repo is for Jakarta projects.  Is there one for TLPs? Apache httpd has its own "site" directory. We might need that, too. I just had a closer look and got it working on my machine.

Re: [Performanc]

2005-04-29 Thread Daniel Naber
On Friday 29 April 2005 04:15, Paul Smith wrote: > At this rate I'm > only getting on average 300-400-ish items/second added to the index. I think that's realistic for typical uses of Lucene on common hardware. > I keep hearing people say "can index millions of docs in a handful of > minutes"

Re: ParallelReader

2005-04-29 Thread rnewson
One tiny point; "enum" is a reserved keyword in JDK 1.5 so the ParallelTermEnum inner class doesn't cleanly compile. Renaming the TermEnum member variable to "termEnum" fixes it. B. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34684] New: - Range Query works only with lower case terms

2005-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34684] - Range Query works only with lower case terms

2005-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Jakarta image on lucene.apache.org

2005-04-29 Thread Daniel Naber
On Friday 29 April 2005 12:15, Erik Hatcher wrote: > Sure, commit it. > > This whole thing with Anakia is a stop-gap solution until our site is > converted to using Forrest. You can now try it by calling ant in the site directory. Regards Daniel -- http://www.danielnaber.de -

Re: [Performanc]

2005-04-29 Thread Paul Smith
At this rate I'm only getting on average 300-400-ish items/second added to the index. I think that's realistic for typical uses of Lucene on common hardware. Thanks Daniel, that's at least comforting to know that it's at least expected. Can you or anyone else comment on the CPU profil

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34684] - Range Query works only with lower case terms

2005-04-29 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu