[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project lucene-java (in module lucene-java) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

[EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project lucene-java (in module lucene-java) failed

To whom it may engage... This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html, and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED] Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration. This issue affects

Re: constant scoring queries

On Wednesday 11 May 2005 04:42, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Hey now... you're going to obsolete all my in-house code and put me > out of a job ;-) We all like cherry picking. > Could you elaborate on the advantage of having say a TermQuery that > could be either normal-scoring or constant-scoring vs tw

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33848] - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when using MultiFieldQueryParser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 33848] - ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException when using MultiFieldQueryParser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32115] - [PATCH] add boost feature to MultiFieldQueryParser

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Inconsistent Read and write behavior in TermInfosWriter and Reader

Hi,While writing an undefined term , the field is inserted into the index as fieldnumber -1 and while reading the same index back an exception is thrown.The behavior should be reversed in my opinion. It should allow insertion of bad data and reads should very pardoning and try to recover from bad

Fwd: [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Project lucene-java (in module lucene-java) failed

Gumpers, What is the issue with Lucene building with Gump? To me it looks as if its not doing a clean build and thus cannot find the JAR that was successfully built in a past run because its looking for it by a different dated name. What does it take to get a clean build going? Should that

[Performance]: IndexWriter again...

Ok, I'm just following up on my email from 29th April titled '[Performanc]'  (don't you love it when you send before you've typed your subject line completely).  The thread is here:http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/lucene-java-dev/200504.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]In summary, I still firmly belie

Re: [Performance]: IndexWriter again...

Silly me, here's the patch with the extra code NOT commented out... Oh my, how embarrassing... :) Paul On 16/05/2005, at 4:15 PM, Paul Smith wrote: - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EM

Re: [Performance]: IndexWriter again...

I'm not even going to say anything this time :-$ On 16/05/2005, at 4:17 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Silly me, here's the patch with the extra code NOT commented out... Oh my, how embarrassing... :) Paul On 16/05/2005, at 4:15 PM, Paul Smith wrote: -

Re: [Performance]: IndexWriter again...

something very odd is going on with my attachments... sorry for the spam. On 16/05/2005, at 4:22 PM, Paul Smith wrote: I'm not even going to say anything this time :-$ On 16/05/2005, at 4:17 PM, Paul Smith wrote: Silly me, here's the patch with the extra code NOT commented out... Oh my, ho