Re: Lucene vs. Ruby/Odeum

Zed has updated his second part with more experiments with different JVM's and memory settings: http://www.zedshaw.com/projects/ruby_odeum/odeum_lucene_part2.html On Jun 2, 2005, at 12:27 AM, Robert Engels wrote: I read all of Zed's posts on the subject and I feel he certainly presents a

RE: Lucene vs. Ruby/Odeum

There are still very SIGNIFICANT problems with his tests. 1. The environment is not "real", except for possibly desktop searching. Whether the JVM needs 64m or 128m to perform adequately is immaterial, given the price of RAM and the ease of expansion. It would be akin to saying "let's all try to w

RE: Lucene vs. Ruby/Odeum

One more thing, I did some simple tests with my caching enhancements. And using a similar test (performing the search for the same word over and over), there was a 100% performance improvement, so I would expect Lucene to blow the doors of Odeum in this case. This is why 'test cases' are so easy t

Re: FieldCache parser

Doug Cutting wrote: Attached is a patch that makes it possible to supply a user-specified parser to FieldCache. For example, one might use this to process a date field as ints even if was not indexed as a decimal integer. As there were no objections, I have committed this patch. Doug --

Re: Potential Segment corruption

Doug Cutting wrote: I think the fix is much simpler. This is a bug in FSDirectory. Directory.createOutput() should always create a new empty file, and FSDirectory's implementation does not ensure this. It should try to delete the file before opening it and/or call RandomAccessFile.setLength(

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 31747] - [PATCH] FSDirectory create() method deletes all files

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 32580] - [PATCH] Submissiom of my Tswana Analyzer

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23774] - [PATCH] Clonable RAMDirectory

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Getting patches into the main code

Hi, I've submitted a patch to fix a bug(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35157) but am unsure what I need to do next to get it into the main code branch. Thanks. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: Lucene vs. Ruby/Odeum

> poor java startup time For the one's really keen on reducing startup time the Jolt Java VM daemon may perhaps be of some interest: http://www.dystance.net/software/jolt/index.html I played with it a year ago when I was curious to see what could be done about startup time in the context of

Re: Getting patches into the main code

Reece - your patch has been applied! Thank you for fixing this just in time for my project needing it :) I renamed the packages/classes of the tests and added the ASL header. There are some minor tweaks to the comments in the test that can be changed now that the bug is fixed - I'll adju

Re: Getting patches into the main code

No problem. Thanks for committing it so quickly! -Reece --- java-dev@lucene.apache.org wrote: Reece - your patch has been applied! Thank you for fixing this just > in time for my project needing it :) I renamed the packages/classes > of the tests and added the ASL header. There are s

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 35157] - Inconsistent scoring with SpanTermQuery in BooleanQuery

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu