On Tuesday 12 July 2005 16:42, Otis Gospodnetic wrote:
> I remember adding some of those, and I don't really recall why I was
> adding them. I think we just didn't have various setters we have now,
> and for some reason chose not to add them. Now that we have (most of
> them?), I think system pr
This may be better for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've looked at the source of that method, but I don't see a way of
removing that synchronized block. Maybe somebody else has ideas, but
it looks like the synchronization is there to ensure the file being
read is read in fully, without some other thread mod
I had posted an NioFile and caching system that greatly increases the
parallelness of Lucene. Although on some platforms (Windows), the low-level
NioChannel is not completely thread-safe so it can still block, although the
code has some work-arounds for this problem.
You can never achieve "100% pa
