about numeric range searching with large value sets patches

2005-08-19 Thread Antoine Brun
Hello, I am trying to integrate the patches for the numeric range searching and the org.apache.lucene.util.Sort class that was posted as an attachment imports a org.apache.lucene.util.IntStack which I can't find. Can anyone add this class? Maybe as an attachment to http://issues.apache.org/bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 36135] - Numeric range searching with large value sets

2005-08-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

RE: about numeric range searching with large value sets patches

2005-08-19 Thread Randy Puttick
My fault, I forgot to attach it. I've added it now. Let me know how this works for you. Randy Puttick -Original Message- From: Antoine Brun [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 19, 2005 8:11 AM To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org Subject: about numeric range searching with large v

Did you mean spell check code

2005-08-19 Thread Ryan
Apologies first since this email isn't directly related to core lucene code. I am trying to locate the source repository (and bug database) for the SpellChecker code (http://wiki.apache.org/jakarta-lucene/SpellChecker). Currently the LuceneDictionary.java file uses enum as a variable name for the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 34946] - MatchAllDocsQuery to return all documents

2005-08-19 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Did you mean spell check code

2005-08-19 Thread Otis Gospodnetic
That code is now a part of Lucene in Subversion, and lives under the contrib/ directory. Just checked the source, and there is no "enum", only "termEnum". Maybe you have an older version of the source. Otis --- Ryan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Apologies first since this email isn't directly