>However the moment you are promoting INTEROPERABILITY
with other
>search/retrieval systems by XMLizing the query input
and the >result output, like Mark is, then it makes
sense to adhere to >standards
I think this is hijacking my original intentions to
some extent. I may be accused of being shor
IndexReader.getCurrentVersion() and isCurrent should use commit lock.
-
Key: LUCENE-481
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-481
Project: Lucene - Java
Type: Bug
Components: Index
Ok. I admit hijacking Mark's original intentions :-) Nevertheless, I think it
would be a very interesting project to expose Lucene indexes via XQuery or at
least XPath initially with Lucene based full-text extensions, regardless of the
type of documents that have been indexed (I'm not talking ab
I've looked at Mark's concept and code, and, IMHO, his implementation is
well-done and addresses a huge need. It allows you to conduct Lucene
searches that can harness all the power of the latest Query objects,
without any special Java coding. Yet it also allows the user to be
presented with
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-450?page=all ]
Yonik Seeley resolved LUCENE-450:
-
Resolution: Fixed
Assign To: Yonik Seeley
patch applied.
> MatchAllDocsQuery doesn't honor boost or queryNorm
> ---
Just added it.
Otis
- Original Message
From: Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: java-user@lucene.apache.org
Sent: Thu 17 Nov 2005 06:56:33 AM EST
Subject: Re: Is there a tool that merges Lucene indexes?
On 17 Nov 2005, at 03:37, Oren Shir wrote:
> Does Luke, Lucli, or any of the exis
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-323?page=comments#action_12361003 ]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-323:
-
Yonik - you committed this? The case is still showing as open, so you may want
to close it if you're done with it.
> [PAT
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-323?page=comments#action_12361012 ]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-323:
-
> Yonik - you committed this? The case is still showing as open, so you may
> want to close it if you're done with it.
This bug al
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-323?page=comments#action_12361018 ]
Chuck Williams commented on LUCENE-323:
---
FYI, I've recently noticed the new implementation of MultiFieldQueryParser (new
to me since I was out of touch for about 6 month
