[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-542?page=all ]
Erik Hatcher closed LUCENE-542:
---
Resolution: Invalid
Colin - as I said in my private e-mail reply to you, this is by design. Tune
into java-user, catch up on past threads discussing this,
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
On Apr 4, 2006, at 10:23 AM, Tatu Saloranta wrote:
So in this case, what would give more comparable results (assuming
you are interested in measuring likely server-side
usage scenario, which is usually what Lucene is used for)
Actually, I think the benchmark results i
Marvin Humphrey wrote:
However, having established that KinoSearch
is in Lucene's league with regards to indexing speed, I'm not worried
about absolute numbers, and the new benchmarker interface is slightly
more stable, allowing more accurate comparative analysis of algorithmic
efficiency.
