Greetings,
In honor of the world cup and players that use 1 name only,
can someone help me with the following...
1) Is there a way to find a document that has null fields?
For example, if I have two fields (FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME) for World Cup players:
FIRST_NAME: Brian LAST_NAME: McBri
I am thinking of modifying lucene's current ranking algorithm to include the
document's recency-weightage. So that the latest modified documents gets
preference over earlier modified documents, which makes sense for news search.
(I believe) To do this I have to tinker with TermScorer.score() me
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416658 ]
paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605:
-
I like the Boolean for indicating the match.
The demo-fix.patch applies cleanly on my working copy, and all tests pass with
it.
I'll
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-605?page=comments#action_12416660 ]
paul.elschot commented on LUCENE-605:
-
I tried removing the Explanation constructor that is deprecated in the
demo-fix.patch.
One of the uses of this constructor is in the
Robert Engels wrote:
Do you have any hard numbers to support this? The last time I checked, gcj
had minimal improvement over JVM 1.5.
In terms of speed, there is not much difference between native code and
classes (see sample timings). However, the pragmatic availability of
java 5 environ
JMA wrote on 06/17/2006 10:16 PM:
> 1) Is there a way to find a document that has null fields?
> For example, if I have two fields (FIRST_NAME, LAST_NAME) for World Cup
> players:
>
> FIRST_NAME: Brian LAST_NAME: McBride
> FIRST_NAME: Agustin LAST_NAME: Delgado
> FIRST_NAME: Zinha
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 06/17/2006 10:52 PM:
> I am thinking of modifying lucene's current ranking algorithm to include the
> document's recency-weightage. So that the latest modified documents gets
> preference over earlier modified documents, which makes sense for news
> search.
>
> (I b
Are you sure about the JVM numbers? I would think that user + sys must
always be < real (unless maybe the multiprocessor affects this - i.e. sums
the processor time used on each).
-Original Message-
From: Vic Bancroft [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 18, 2006 11:55 AM
To: [EMA
Using the doc-id itself as a recency metric is smart thinking. But the weight
is actually a sigmoidal function based on the oldness(i.e.
currentTime-documentIndexingTime), hence just cant use the doc-id itself.
What is the JIRA BUGid for the lazy fiekd capability. Woudl like to know more
abou
Any specific reason why PorterStemmer class in org.apache.lucene.analysis is
not made public?
Thank you,
Best Regards,
Bhoomi Mehta
Sr. Project Leader
I- Link Infosoft (G) Pvt . Ltd.
Ahmedabad
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To un
: If this is the case, who ever has the karma to fix this, can you take care
: of it?
I think the proper way to deal with this is to file a Jira request with
the Infrastructure Project in the JIRA component, but I'm not 100% sure.
: Also, I can't figure out how to assign, close or even edit a JI
: Subject: Recency weightage in Lucene
:
: I am thinking of modifying lucene's current ranking algorithm to include
: the document's recency-weightage. So that the latest modified documents
: gets preference over earlier modified documents, which makes sense for
: news search.
FunctionQuery is yo
Hi,
I want to use the PorterStemmer class, but as it is not visible to
outside the package I am unable to use it.
Is their any specific reason that PorterStemmer is not public?
Thanks & Regards,
Sr. Software Engineer
I- Link Infosoft (G) Pvt . Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
13 matches
Mail list logo
