Le Jeudi 20 Juillet 2006 22:18, Marvin Humphrey a écrit :
> On Jul 19, 2006, at 10:26 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
> > Then I looked deeper in the Lucene file format, and I manage to
> > introduce some
> > generic field metadata without breaking the file format
> > compatibility. I just
> > used anot
On Jul 21, 2006, at 1:23 AM, Nicolas Lalevée wrote:
In fact, that was my first implementaion. The problem with that is
you can
only store one value. But thinking a little more about it, storing
one or
more value is not an issue, because with the solution I proposed,
no space is
saved at al
I remember reading somewhere (SDF javadoc?) that SDF instances are not
thread-safe. I take it that means class instances could mean trouble.
Otis
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 21, 2006 4:38:23 PM
Subject: svn commit: r424449 -
/luc
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-550?page=comments#action_12422795 ]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-550:
In order to find the norm-error I ported all test cases. I'm sorry to report
that 70 of them fails.
So if anyone use this
: I remember reading somewhere (SDF javadoc?) that SDF instances are not
: thread-safe. I take it that means class instances could mean trouble.
correct, but all usages of the static formaters in this patch seem to be
synchronized, so it's probably not an issue -- however i'm not sure if the
per
