Fwd: CLucene incubation - call for a mentor

2006-10-15 Thread Erik Hatcher
forwarding this on to perhaps a wider audience. perhaps this can dove-tail with the Lucy incubation? Begin forwarded message: From: "Ben van Klinken" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: October 14, 2006 3:20:10 AM EDT To: general@lucene.apache.org Subject: CLucene incubation - call for a mentor Reply-

[jira] Created: (LUCENE-684) Refrase javadoc 1st sentence for IndexReader.deleteDocuments

2006-10-15 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
Refrase javadoc 1st sentence for IndexReader.deleteDocuments Key: LUCENE-684 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-684 Project: Lucene - Java Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-684) Refrase javadoc 1st sentence for IndexReader.deleteDocuments

2006-10-15 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-684?page=all ] Paul Elschot updated LUCENE-684: Attachment: IndexReader1.patch Mention that the term should have been indexed for IndexReader.deleteDocuments to work. > Refrase javadoc 1st sentence for Inde

Re: CLucene incubation - call for a mentor

2006-10-15 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Oct 15, 2006, at 3:13 AM, Erik Hatcher wrote: perhaps this can dove-tail with the Lucy incubation? Lucy is all new code, so the project isn't actually passing through the incubator. We're looking at what Lucene did, what Ferret (Ruby/ C, Dave Balmain) did, and what KinoSearch (Perl/C,

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-684) Refrase javadoc 1st sentence for IndexReader.deleteDocuments

2006-10-15 Thread Daniel Naber (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-684?page=all ] Daniel Naber closed LUCENE-684. --- Fix Version/s: 2.0.1 Resolution: Fixed Thanks, patch applied. > Refrase javadoc 1st sentence for IndexReader.deleteDocuments > ---

Re: CLucene incubation - call for a mentor

2006-10-15 Thread Ben van Klinken
Hi, Lucy is certainly an interesting project. There is a great advantage of having a C language lucene which doesn't conform as closely to the java lucene api (as CLucene does). I imagine there are many optimisations available. But CLucene does offer something to developers, among other things: a

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-683) Lazy Field Loading has edge case bug causing read past EOF

2006-10-15 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-683?page=comments#action_12442426 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-683: - Ouch! There is a very serious bug somewhere... I briefly checked out this test and expanded it, and you aren't even guar

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-683) Lazy Field Loading has edge case bug causing read past EOF

2006-10-15 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-683?page=comments#action_12442429 ] Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-683: - Found it... the thread local that held the fieldsStream was static, and hence not bound to any particular FieldsReader!

[jira] Closed: (LUCENE-683) Lazy Field Loading has edge case bug causing read past EOF

2006-10-15 Thread Yonik Seeley (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-683?page=all ] Yonik Seeley closed LUCENE-683. --- Fix Version/s: 2.0.1 Resolution: Fixed Assignee: Yonik Seeley fix and modified test case committed. > Lazy Field Loading has edge case bug causin

email replies to JIRA issues

2006-10-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
FYI, It looks like infra has now set things up so that email replies to jira issues will be added as jira comments (but I haven't personally tried it). Someone brought this idea up at the Lucene BOF at ApacheCon. -Yonik http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server

Re: email replies to JIRA issues

2006-10-15 Thread Yonik Seeley
Actually, it looks like only replies going to [EMAIL PROTECTED] (the default) will be added as comments. Our setup has the reply-to set to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by default, so those probably won't be added. -Yonik http://incubator.apache.org/solr Solr, the open-source Lucene search server On 10/15/