[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-703?page=all ]
Mark Harwood closed LUCENE-703.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Change QueryParser to use ConstantScoreRangeQuery in preference to RangeQuery
> by default
>
I will be out of the office starting 11/16/2006 and will not return until
11/29/2006.
I will respond to your message when I return.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
lucene/java/trunk/docs/whoweare.html
lucene/java/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml
It looks like you still need to refresh the website.
ssh people.apache.org
cd /www/lucene.apache.org/java/docs
svn up
Doug
--
Doug Cutting wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Modified:
lucene/java/trunk/docs/whoweare.html
lucene/java/trunk/xdocs/whoweare.xml
It looks like you still need to refresh the website.
ssh people.apache.org
cd /www/lucene.apache.org/java/docs
svn up
Woops! OK I've done this now.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-675:
---
Attachment: benchmark.byTask.patch
I am attaching benchmark.byTask.patch - to be applied in the contrib/benchmark
directory.
Root package of byTask classes was
When the field stores offsets and positions of its terms within term vectors
(in the .tvf file), these are not specified in the file format
documentation.
But looking to the TermVectorsWriter within the writeField() method, you'll
see that if offsets and positions are required, then these are wri
File Formats Documentation is not correct for Term Vectors
--
Key: LUCENE-713
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-713
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Compo
Doron,
On Thursday 16 November 2006 21:17, Doron Cohen (JIRA) wrote:
> ...
> PS. Before submitting the patch file, I tried to apply it myself on a clean
version of the code, just to make sure that it works. But I got errors like
this -- Could not retrieve revision 0 of "...\byTask\.." -- for eve
Doron Cohen (JIRA) wrote:
> [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-675?page=all ]
> (I used Tortoise SVN to create the patch).
I haven't tried to use TortoiseSVN to create patches, but my experience
with it for other purposes has been negative enough, especially in
trying to use it on
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-707?page=comments#action_12450567 ]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-707:
I think I have ironed out the issues. I am not going to submit a patch, just
yet, instead I ask that people go re
: Please let me know what you think, but stick to layout problems and
: introduced errors (i.e. write up a different bug for errors in the
: documentation that already exist).
I don't know enough about forrest to explain this, but all of the pages
seem to be getting an empty (the PDFs don't see
Good catch. Shows you how little I look at the title! Anyway, it
appears that SOLR does it as Title
whereas our old xdocs are Titleproperties>. Apparently, Forrest and Anakia have different
interpretations of xdocs.
Updates are on http://people.apache.org/~gsingers/site/
-Grant
On Nov
12 matches
Mail list logo
